Origins of Creativity in Attention-Based Diffusion Models
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling
Abstract (arXiv)
As diffusion models have become the tool of choice for image generation and as the quality of the images continues to improve, the question of how `creativity' originates in diffusion has become increasingly important. The score matching perspective on diffusion has proven particularly fruitful for understanding how and why diffusion models generate images that remain plausible while differing significantly from their training images. In particular, as explained in (Kamb & Ganguli, 2024) and others, e.g., (Ambrogioni, 2023), theory suggests that if our score matching were optimal, we would only be able to recover training samples through our diffusion process. However, as shown by Kamb & Ganguli, (2024), in diffusion models where the score is parametrized by a simple CNN, the inductive biases of the CNN itself (translation equivariance and locality) allow the model to generate samples that globally do not match any training samples, but are rather patch-wise `mosaics'. Notably, however, this theory does not extend to describe the role of self-attention in this process. In this work, we take a preliminary step in this direction to extend this theory to the case of diffusion models whose score is parametrized by a CNN with a final self-attention layer. We show that our theory suggests that self-attention will induce a globally image-consistent arrangement of local features beyond the patch-level in generated samples, and we verify this behavior empirically on a carefully crafted dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.
Builds on
6 of 9 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Dynamical Regimes of Diffusion Models28 Feb
- 2024A Good Score Does not Lead to A Good Generative Model10 Jan
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models19 Jun
Other references · 3
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
- 2024An analytic theory of creativity in convolutional diffusion modelscited by 104
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026A Random Matrix Theory Perspective on the Consistency of Diffusion Modelscited by 6
- 2026An exact information theory of generalization phase transitions in Bayesian diffusion modelscited by 3
- 2026The two clocks and the innovation window: When and how generative models learn rulescited by 1
- 2026Representation Gap: Explaining the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Neural Networks from a Geometric Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026An exact information theory of generalization phase transitions in Bayesian diffusion models9 Jul 2026
- 2026Representation Gap: Explaining the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Neural Networks from a Geometric Perspective20 May 2026
- 2026The two clocks and the innovation window: When and how generative models learn rules11 May 2026
- 2026A Random Matrix Theory Perspective on the Consistency of Diffusion Models2 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Diffusion Models, Denoiser Architecture and Creativity
- 2022How Much is Enough? A Study on Diffusion Times in Score-based Generative Models
- 2026Where the Score Lives: A Wavelet View of Diffusion
- 2022A Survey on Generative Diffusion Model
- 2025Does Generation Require Memorization? Creative Diffusion Models using Ambient Diffusion
- 2026When Are Two Scores Better Than One? Investigating Ensembles of Diffusion Models
- 2024Analyzing Neural Network-Based Generative Diffusion Models through Convex Optimization
- 2023On Memorization in Diffusion Models