mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TriCon-SF: A Triple-Shuffle and Contribution-Aware Serial Federated Learning Framework for Heterogeneous Healthcare Data

arXiv 2506.16723 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Serial pipeline training is an efficient paradigm for handling data heterogeneity in cross-silo federated learning with low communication overhead. However, even without centralized aggregation, direct transfer of models between clients can violate privacy regulations and remain susceptible to gradient leakage and linkage attacks. Additionally, ensuring resilience against semi-honest or malicious clients who may manipulate or misuse received models remains a grand challenge, particularly in privacy-sensitive domains such as healthcare. To address these challenges, we propose TriCon-SF, a novel serial federated learning framework that integrates triple shuffling and contribution awareness. TriCon-SF introduces three levels of randomization by shuffling model layers, data segments, and training sequences to break deterministic learning patterns and disrupt potential attack vectors, thereby enhancing privacy and robustness. In parallel, it leverages Shapley value methods to dynamically evaluate client contributions during training, enabling the detection of dishonest behavior and enhancing system accountability. Extensive experiments on non-IID healthcare datasets demonstrate that TriCon-SF outperforms standard serial and parallel federated learning in both accuracy and communication efficiency. Security analysis further supports its resilience against client-side privacy attacks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2025.

Builds on

21 of 38 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  4. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  5. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  6. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  7. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
  8. 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
  9. 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 395
  10. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Surveycited by 346
  11. 2020SplitFed: When Federated Learning Meets Split Learningcited by 310
  12. 2018Distributed learning of deep neural network over multiple agentscited by 279
9 more
  1. 2018Multi-Institutional Deep Learning Modeling Without Sharing Patient Data: A Feasibility Study on Brain Tumor Segmentationcited by 149
  2. 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
  3. 2021Rethinking Architecture Design for Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learningcited by 111
  4. 2020Unleashing the Tiger: Inference Attacks on Split Learningcited by 105
  5. 2023Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 86
  6. 2023FedDisco: Federated Learning with Discrepancy-Aware Collaborationcited by 67
  7. 2023Peer-to-Peer Federated Continual Learning for Naturalistic Driving Action Recognitioncited by 19
  8. 2023Split Ways: Privacy-Preserving Training of Encrypted Data Using Split Learningcited by 15
  9. 2023Split Without a Leak: Reducing Privacy Leakage in Split Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.