Black-Box Privacy Attacks on Shared Representations in Multitask Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multitask learning (MTL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm that leverages similarities among multiple learning tasks, each with insufficient samples to train a standalone model, to solve them simultaneously while minimizing data sharing across users and organizations. MTL typically accomplishes this goal by learning a shared representation that captures common structure among the tasks by embedding data from all tasks into a common feature space. Despite being designed to be the smallest unit of shared information necessary to effectively learn patterns across multiple tasks, these shared representations can inadvertently leak sensitive information about the particular tasks they were trained on. In this work, we investigate what information is revealed by the shared representations through the lens of inference attacks. Towards this, we propose a novel, black-box task-inference threat model where the adversary, given the embedding vectors produced by querying the shared representation on samples from a particular task, aims to determine whether that task was present when training the shared representation. We develop efficient, purely black-box attacks on machine learning models that exploit the dependencies between embeddings from the same task without requiring shadow models or labeled reference data. We evaluate our attacks across vision and language domains for multiple use cases of MTL and demonstrate that even with access only to fresh task samples rather than training data, a black-box adversary can successfully infer a task's inclusion in training. To complement our experiments, we provide theoretical analysis of a simplified learning setting and show a strict separation between adversaries with training samples and fresh samples from the target task's distribution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2025.
Builds on
62 of 84 references.
References · 62
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
38 more
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
- 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2023Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Modelscited by 732
- 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 672
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
- 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 511
- 2021Towards Personalized Federated Learningcited by 464
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 460
- 2020Three Approaches for Personalization with Applications to Federated Learningcited by 325
- 2020Personalized Federated Learning: A Meta-Learning Approachcited by 312
- 2021Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 248
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 218
- 2020Federated Learning of a Mixture of Global and Local Modelscited by 210
- 2020Information Leakage in Embedding Modelscited by 203
- 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?cited by 195
- 2020Salvaging Federated Learning by Local Adaptationcited by 142
- 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 130
- 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 110
- 2023Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attackscited by 107
- 2020When is Memorization of Irrelevant Training Data Necessary for High-Accuracy Learning?cited by 104
- 2024Min-K%++: Improved Baseline for Detecting Pre-Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 103
- 2019Overlearning Reveals Sensitive Attributescited by 76
- 2021EncoderMI: Membership Inference against Pre-trained Encoders in Contrastive Learningcited by 73
- 2021Learning with User-Level Privacycited by 72
- 2022Where to Begin? On the Impact of Pre-Training and Initialization in Federated Learningcited by 71
- 2021Generalization in NLI: Ways (Not) To Go Beyond Simple Heuristicscited by 67
- 2021Property Inference From Poisoningcited by 60
- 2015Massively Multitask Networks for Drug Discoverycited by 49
- 2022Cross-Silo Federated Learning: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 38
- 2023User Inference Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2021Property Inference Attacks Against GANscited by 33
- 2020Investigating Membership Inference Attacks under Data Dependenciescited by 32
- 2022SNAP: Efficient Extraction of Private Properties with Poisoningcited by 31
- 2024Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with User-Level Differential Privacycited by 29
- 2024Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 24
50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.