mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Condition Number as a Scale-Invariant Proxy for Information Encoding in Neural Units

arXiv 2506.16289 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper explores the relationship between the condition number of a neural network's weight tensor and the extent of information encoded by the associated processing unit, viewed through the lens of information theory. It argues that a high condition number, though not sufficient for effective knowledge encoding, may indicate that the unit has learned to selectively amplify and compress information. This intuition is formalized for linear units with Gaussian inputs, linking the condition number and the transformation's log-volume scaling factor to the characteristics of the output entropy and the geometric properties of the learned transformation. The analysis demonstrates that for a fixed weight norm, a concentrated distribution of singular values (high condition number) corresponds to reduced overall information transfer, indicating a specialized and efficient encoding strategy. Furthermore, the linear stage entropy bound provides an upper limit on post-activation information for contractive, element-wise nonlinearities, supporting the condition number as a scale-invariant proxy for encoding capacity in practical neural networks. An empirical case study applies these principles to guide selective fine-tuning of Large Language Models for both a new task and a new input modality. The experiments show that the proposed method, named KappaTune, effectively mitigates catastrophic forgetting. Unlike many existing catastrophic forgetting mitigation methods that rely on access to pre-training statistics, which are often unavailable, this selective fine-tuning approach offers a way to bypass this common requirement.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2025.

Builds on

15 of 19 references.

References · 15

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  3. 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
  4. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  5. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
  6. 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
  7. 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,135
  8. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
  9. 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 898
  10. 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
  11. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 417
  12. 2024OLMoE: Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 301
3 more
  1. 2017Routing Networks: Adaptive Selection of Non-linear Functions for Multi-Task Learningcited by 126
  2. 2016Improving training of deep neural networks via Singular Value Boundingcited by 26
  3. 2024CLASSP: a Biologically-Inspired Approach to Continual Learning through Adjustment Suppression and Sparsity Promotioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.