RAGtifier: Evaluating RAG Generation Approaches of State-of-the-Art RAG Systems for the SIGIR LiveRAG Competition
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enriches Large Language Models (LLMs) by combining their internal, parametric knowledge with external, non-parametric sources, with the goal of improving factual correctness and minimizing hallucinations. The LiveRAG 2025 challenge explores RAG solutions to maximize accuracy on DataMorgana's QA pairs, which are composed of single-hop and multi-hop questions. The challenge provides access to sparse OpenSearch and dense Pinecone indices of the Fineweb 10BT dataset. It restricts model use to LLMs with up to 10B parameters and final answer generation with Falcon-3-10B. A judge-LLM assesses the submitted answers along with human evaluators. By exploring distinct retriever combinations and RAG solutions under the challenge conditions, our final solution emerged using InstructRAG in combination with a Pinecone retriever and a BGE reranker. Our solution achieved a correctness score of 1.13 and a faithfulness score of 0.55 in the non-human evaluation, placing it overall in third place in the SIGIR 2025 LiveRAG Challenge.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2025.
Builds on
18 of 39 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Generating Diverse Q&A Benchmarks for RAG Evaluation with DataMorgana22 Jan
- 2024CRAG -- Comprehensive RAG Benchmark7 Jun
- 2024Stochastic RAG: End-to-End Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Expected Utility Maximization5 May
- 2024The Power of Noise: Redefining Retrieval for RAG Systems26 Jan
- 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation26 Sep
Other references · 13
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,128
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
- 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 368
- 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 367
- 2024Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreementcited by 105
- 2024InstructRAG: Instructing Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Self-Synthesized Rationalescited by 101
- 2023Information Retrieval: Recent Advances and Beyondcited by 49
- 2024Style Outweighs Substance: Failure Modes of LLM Judges in Alignment Benchmarkingcited by 35
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025SIGIR 2025 -- LiveRAG Challenge Reportcited by 0
- 2025SIGIR 2025 -- LiveRAG Challenge Report7 Jul 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024RAGLAB: A Modular and Research-Oriented Unified Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025LiveRAG: A diverse Q&A dataset with varying difficulty level for RAG evaluation
- 2024MultiHop-RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Hop Queries
- 2026RAG-TESTER: Automated End-to-End Testing of Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
- 2024SFR-RAG: Towards Contextually Faithful LLMs
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2026Mapping the RAG Landscape: A Four Axis Taxonomy of Efficiency, Defense, Interactivity, and Reasoning
- 2025MIRAGE: A Metric-Intensive Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation