Enclosing Prototypical Variational Autoencoder for Explainable Out-of-Distribution Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the decision-making and trusting the reliability of Deep Machine Learning Models is crucial for adopting such methods to safety-relevant applications. We extend self-explainable Prototypical Variational models with autoencoder-based out-of-distribution (OOD) detection: A Variational Autoencoder is applied to learn a meaningful latent space which can be used for distance-based classification, likelihood estimation for OOD detection, and reconstruction. The In-Distribution (ID) region is defined by a Gaussian mixture distribution with learned prototypes representing the center of each mode. Furthermore, a novel restriction loss is introduced that promotes a compact ID region in the latent space without collapsing it into single points. The reconstructive capabilities of the Autoencoder ensure the explainability of the prototypes and the ID region of the classifier, further aiding the discrimination of OOD samples. Extensive evaluations on common OOD detection benchmarks as well as a large-scale dataset from a real-world railway application demonstrate the usefulness of the approach, outperforming previous methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2025.
Builds on
25 of 27 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
- 2016Real-Time Single Image and Video Super-Resolution Using an Efficient Sub-Pixel Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 1,204
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 600
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
13 more
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 405
- 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 268
- 2021Adversarial Reciprocal Points Learning for Open Set Recognitioncited by 153
- 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
- 2019C2AE: Class Conditioned Auto-Encoder for Open-set Recognitioncited by 142
- 2021PixMix: Dreamlike Pictures Comprehensively Improve Safety Measurescited by 131
- 2020Conditional Gaussian Distribution Learning for Open Set Recognitioncited by 104
- 2022Denoising diffusion models for out-of-distribution detectioncited by 104
- 2018Improving Reconstruction Autoencoder Out-of-distribution Detection with Mahalanobis Distancecited by 74
- 2022Rethinking Reconstruction Autoencoder-Based Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 59
- 2022ProtoVAE: A Trustworthy Self-Explainable Prototypical Variational Modelcited by 34
- 2022What do we learn? Debunking the Myth of Unsupervised Outlier Detectioncited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.