mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dividing Conflicting Items Fairly

arXiv 2506.14149 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2025cs.GTcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the allocation of indivisible goods under conflicting constraints, represented by a graph. In this framework, vertices correspond to goods and edges correspond to conflicts between a pair of goods. Each agent is allocated an independent set in the graph. In a recent work of Kumar et al. (2024), it was shown that a maximal EF1 allocation exists for interval graphs and two agents with monotone valuations. We significantly extend this result by establishing that a maximal EF1 allocation exists for any graph when the two agents have monotone valuations. To compute such an allocation, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for additive valuations, as well as a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for monotone valuations. Moreover, we complement our findings by providing a counterexample demonstrating a maximal EF1 allocation may not exist for three agents with monotone valuations; further, we establish NP-hardness of determining the existence of such allocations for every fixed number n ≥ 3 of agents. All of our results for goods also apply to the allocation of chores.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.