Taming Polysemanticity in LLMs: Provable Feature Recovery via Sparse Autoencoders
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the challenge of achieving theoretically grounded feature recovery using Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) for the interpretation of Large Language Models. Existing SAE training algorithms often lack rigorous mathematical guarantees and suffer from practical limitations such as hyperparameter sensitivity and instability. To address these issues, we first propose a novel statistical framework for the feature recovery problem, which includes a new notion of feature identifiability by modeling polysemantic features as sparse mixtures of underlying monosemantic concepts. Building on this framework, we introduce a new SAE training algorithm based on ``bias adaptation'', a technique that adaptively adjusts neural network bias parameters to ensure appropriate activation sparsity. We theoretically highlightprove that this algorithm correctly recovers all monosemantic features when input data is sampled from our proposed statistical model. Furthermore, we develop an improved empirical variant, Group Bias Adaptation (GBA), and highlightdemonstrate its superior performance against benchmark methods when applied to LLMs with up to 1.5 billion parameters. This work represents a foundational step in demystifying SAE training by providing the first SAE algorithm with theoretical recovery guarantees, thereby advancing the development of more transparent and trustworthy AI systems through enhanced mechanistic interpretability.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy
- 2025Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders for Monosemantic Representation
- 2025Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous Words
- 2026The Rate-Distortion-Polysemanticity Tradeoff in SAEs
- 2025Sparse Shift Autoencoders for Identifying Concepts from Large Language Model Activations
- 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models
- 2025Beyond Redundancy: Diverse and Specialized Multi-Expert Sparse Autoencoder
- 2025AdaptiveK: Complexity-Driven Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Language Model Representations