mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Advancing Image-Based Grapevine Variety Classification with a New Benchmark and Evaluation of Masked Autoencoders

arXiv 2506.13335 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Grapevine varieties are essential for the economies of many wine-producing countries, influencing the production of wine, juice, and the consumption of fruits and leaves. Traditional identification methods, such as ampelography and molecular analysis, have limitations: ampelography depends on expert knowledge and is inherently subjective, while molecular methods are costly and time-intensive. To address these limitations, recent studies have applied deep learning (DL) models to classify grapevine varieties using image data. However, due to the small dataset sizes, these methods often depend on transfer learning from datasets from other domains, e.g., ImageNet1K (IN1K), which can lead to performance degradation due to domain shift and supervision collapse. In this context, self-supervised learning (SSL) methods can be a good tool to avoid this performance degradation, since they can learn directly from data, without external labels. This study presents an evaluation of Masked Autoencoders (MAEs) for identifying grapevine varieties based on field-acquired images. The main contributions of this study include two benchmarks comprising 43 grapevine varieties collected across different seasons, an analysis of MAE's application in the agricultural context, and a performance comparison of trained models across seasons. Our results show that a ViT-B/16 model pre-trained with MAE and the unlabeled dataset achieved an F1 score of 0.7956, outperforming all other models. Additionally, we observed that pre-trained models benefit from long pre-training, perform well under low-data training regime, and that simple data augmentation methods are more effective than complex ones. The study also found that the mask ratio in MAE impacts performance only marginally.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.

Builds on

35 of 89 references.

References · 35

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  7. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  8. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  9. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  10. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  11. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  12. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
23 more
  1. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  2. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  3. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  4. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
  5. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  7. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  8. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  9. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  10. 2023A Cookbook of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 250
  11. 2020CrossTransformers: spatially-aware few-shot transfercited by 174
  12. 2021Benchmarking Representation Learning for Natural World Image Collectionscited by 168
  13. 2015An open access repository of images on plant health to enable the development of mobile disease diagnosticscited by 135
  14. 2021TransFG: A Transformer Architecture for Fine-grained Recognitioncited by 132
  15. 2021Are Large-scale Datasets Necessary for Self-Supervised Pre-training?cited by 117
  16. 2022Learning from Few Examples: A Summary of Approaches to Few-Shot Learningcited by 86
  17. 2022The Hidden Uniform Cluster Prior in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 58
  18. 2020A survey on Semi-, Self- and Unsupervised Learning for Image Classificationcited by 55
  19. 2021Knowledge-aware Zero-Shot Learning: Survey and Perspectivecited by 41
  20. 2019Grape detection, segmentation and tracking using deep neural networks and three-dimensional associationcited by 21
  21. 2023Label-Efficient Learning in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 16
  22. 2023INoD: Injected Noise Discriminator for Self-Supervised Representation Learning in Agricultural Fieldscited by 6
  23. 2024Classification of grapevine varieties using UAV hyperspectral imagingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.