Adapting LLMs for Minimal-edit Grammatical Error Correction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decoder-only large language models have shown superior performance in the fluency-edit English Grammatical Error Correction, but their adaptation for minimal-edit English GEC is still underexplored. To improve their effectiveness in the minimal-edit approach, we explore the error rate adaptation topic and propose a novel training schedule method. Our experiments set a new state-of-the-art result for a single-model system on the BEA-test set. We also detokenize the most common English GEC datasets to match the natural way of writing text. During the process, we find that there are errors in them. Our experiments analyze whether training on detokenized datasets impacts the results and measure the impact of the usage of the datasets with corrected erroneous examples. To facilitate reproducibility, we have released the source code used to train our models.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.
Builds on
12 of 26 references.
References · 12
- 2020GECToR -- Grammatical Error Correction: Tag, Not Rewritecited by 177
- 2021A Simple Recipe for Multilingual Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 108
- 2017JFLEG: A Fluency Corpus and Benchmark for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 97
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 97
- 2018Approaching Neural Grammatical Error Correction as a Low-Resource Machine Translation Taskcited by 56
- 2021Synthetic Data Generation for Grammatical Error Correction with Tagged Corruption Modelscited by 56
- 2019An Empirical Study of Incorporating Pseudo Data into Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 55
- 2023Exploring Effectiveness of GPT-3 in Grammatical Error Correction: A Study on Performance and Controllability in Prompt-Based Methodscited by 37
- 2024Prompting open-source and commercial language models for grammatical error correction of English learner textcited by 24
- 2018Reaching Human-level Performance in Automatic Grammatical Error Correction: An Empirical Studycited by 22
- 2024Improving Grammatical Error Correction via Contextual Data Augmentationcited by 6
- 2024Alirector: Alignment-Enhanced Chinese Grammatical Error Correctorcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Edit-level Majority Voting Mitigates Over-Correction in LLM-based Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 1
- 2026How Far Can Prompting Go for Minimal-Edit Ukrainian Grammatical Error Correction?cited by 1
- 2026The Impact of Editorial Intervention on Detecting Native Language Tracescited by 0
- 2026Incentives Of EdTech: A Systematic Review Of EduNLP Researchcited by 0
- 2026Larger Context Window, Fewer Overcorrections: Optimizing Prompts and Batching for Minimal-Edit Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 0
- 2026Larger Context Window, Fewer Overcorrections: Optimizing Prompts and Batching for Minimal-Edit Grammatical Error Correction9 Sep 2026
- 2026How Far Can Prompting Go for Minimal-Edit Ukrainian Grammatical Error Correction?8 Jun 2026
- 2026Incentives Of EdTech: A Systematic Review Of EduNLP Research13 May 2026
- 2026Edit-level Majority Voting Mitigates Over-Correction in LLM-based Grammatical Error Correction13 May 2026
- 2026The Impact of Editorial Intervention on Detecting Native Language Traces11 May 2026