SciDA: Scientific Dynamic Assessor of LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Advancement in Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning capabilities enables them to solve scientific problems with enhanced efficacy. Thereby, a high-quality benchmark for comprehensive and appropriate assessment holds significance, while existing ones either confront the risk of data contamination or lack involved disciplines. To be specific, due to the data source overlap of LLMs training and static benchmark, the keys or number pattern of answers inadvertently memorized (i.e. data contamination), leading to systematic overestimation of their reasoning capabilities, especially numerical reasoning. We propose SciDA, a multidisciplinary benchmark that consists exclusively of over 1k Olympic-level numerical computation problems, allowing randomized numerical initializations for each inference round to avoid reliance on fixed numerical patterns. We conduct a series of experiments with both closed-source and open-source top-performing LLMs, and it is observed that the performance of LLMs drop significantly under random numerical initialization. Thus, we provide truthful and unbiased assessments of the numerical reasoning capabilities of LLMs. The data is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/m-a-p/SciDA
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.
Builds on
17 of 20 references.
References · 17
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
- 2023SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 246
- 2023Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language Modelscited by 175
- 2024MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 144
- 2023Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Modelscited by 136
5 more
- 2024Generalization or Memorization: Data Contamination and Trustworthy Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 119
- 2023SciEval: A Multi-Level Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark for Scientific Researchcited by 112
- 2024MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmarkcited by 103
- 2025Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 65
- 2024VarBench: Robust Language Model Benchmarking Through Dynamic Variable Perturbationcited by 29
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Models
- 2025Understanding and Mitigating Numerical Sources of Nondeterminism in LLM Inference
- 2025Reasoning on a Budget: A Survey of Adaptive and Controllable Test-Time Compute in LLMs
- 2026Can LLM Reasoning Be Trusted? A Comparative Study: Using Human Benchmarking on Statistical Tasks
- 2024Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?
- 2026ThinkBooster: A Unified Framework for Seamless Test-Time Scaling of LLM Reasoning
- 2025ThinkBench: Dynamic Out-of-Distribution Evaluation for Robust LLM Reasoning
- 2025SCI-Verifier: Scientific Verifier with Thinking