Behavioral Generative Agents for Energy Operations
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Problem definition: Accurately modeling consumer behavior in energy operations is challenging due to uncertainty, behavioral heterogeneity, and limited empirical data-particularly in low-frequency, high-impact events. While generative AI trained on large-scale human data offers new opportunities to study decision behavior, its role in operational applications remains unclear. We examine how generative agents can support customer behavior discovery in energy operations, complementing rather than replacing human-based experiments. Methodology/results: We introduce a novel approach leveraging generative agents-artificial agents powered by large language models-to simulate sequential customer decisions under dynamic electricity prices and outage risks. We find that these agents behave more optimally and rationally in simpler market scenarios, while their performance becomes more variable and suboptimal as task complexity rises. Furthermore, the agents exhibit heterogeneous customer preferences, consistently maintaining distinct, persona-driven reasoning patterns in both operational decisions and textual reasoning. Comparisons with dynamic programming and greedy policy benchmarks show alignment between specific personas and distinct heuristic decision policies. In low-frequency, high-impact events such as blackouts, agents prioritize energy reliability over cost or profit, demonstrating their ability to uncover behavioral patterns beyond the rigidity of traditional mathematical models. Managerial Implications: Our findings suggest that behavioral generative agents can serve as scalable and flexible tools for studying consumer behavior in energy operations. By enabling controlled experiments across heterogeneous customer types and rare events, these agents can enhance the design of energy management systems and support more informed analysis of energy policies and incentive programs.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2025.
Builds on
13 of 57 references.
References · 13
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 372
- 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 294
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Taskscited by 222
- 2023Generative agent-based modeling with actions grounded in physical, social, or digital space using Concordiacited by 126
- 2024LLM economicus? Mapping the Behavioral Biases of LLMs via Utility Theorycited by 47
- 2024Large Language Models: An Applied Econometric Frameworkcited by 32
- 2024Learning to Cooperate with Humans using Generative Agentscited by 24
- 2023Prompt Tuning Large Language Models on Personalized Aspect Extraction for Recommendationscited by 13
- 2024Contextual Restless Multi-Armed Bandits with Application to Demand Response Decision-Makingcited by 7
- 2014Optimal Hour-Ahead Bidding in the Real-Time Electricity Market with Battery Storage using Approximate Dynamic Programmingcited by 6
- 2024Optimal Mechanisms for Demand Response: An Indifference Set Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AI agents in Algorithmic Electricity Markets: On the Emergence of Tacit Collusion
- 2025Agentic AI Systems in Electrical Power Systems Engineering: Current State-of-the-Art and Challenges
- 2025From Transformers to Large Language Models: A systematic review of AI applications in the energy sector towards Agentic Digital Twins
- 2026Hybrid Human-Agent Social Dilemmas in Energy Markets
- 2026LLM-Mediated Demand Response Coordination in Smart Microgrids
- 2026Identifying and Prioritizing Generative AI Use Cases in an Organization: An Industrial Case Study ↗
- 2025Can Generative AI agents behave like humans? Evidence from laboratory market experiments
- 2026From Caveman to Expert Analyst: Energy Consumption of Variable LLM Tasks