mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Focusing on Students, not Machines: Grounded Question Generation and Automated Answer Grading

arXiv 2506.12066 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Digital technologies are increasingly used in education to reduce the workload of teachers and students. However, creating open-ended study or examination questions and grading their answers is still a tedious task. This thesis presents the foundation for a system that generates questions grounded in class materials and automatically grades student answers. It introduces a sophisticated method for chunking documents with a visual layout, specifically targeting PDF documents. This method enhances the accuracy of downstream tasks, including Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). Our thesis demonstrates that high-quality questions and reference answers can be generated from study material. Further, it introduces a new benchmark for automated grading of short answers to facilitate comparison of automated grading systems. An evaluation of various grading systems is conducted and indicates that Large Language Models (LLMs) can generalise to the task of automated grading of short answers from their pre-training tasks. As with other tasks, increasing the parameter size of the LLMs leads to greater performance. Currently, available systems still need human oversight, especially in examination scenarios.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Enhancing LLM-Based Short Answer Grading with Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  2. 2024Grade Like a Human: Rethinking Automated Assessment with Large Language Models
  3. 2025SteLLA: A Structured Grading System Using LLMs with RAG
  4. 2024Beyond Scores: A Modular RAG-Based System for Automatic Short Answer Scoring with Feedback
  5. 2023Retrieval-augmented Generation to Improve Math Question-Answering: Trade-offs Between Groundedness and Human Preference
  6. 2024Automated Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models with Task-Specific Exam Generation
  7. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Domain-Specific Question Answering: A Case Study on Pittsburgh and CMU
  8. 2025Leveraging In-Context Learning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Automatic Question Generation in Educational Domains