Configurable Preference Tuning with Rubric-Guided Synthetic Data
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Models of human feedback for AI alignment, such as those underpinning Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), often bake in a singular, static set of preferences, limiting adaptability. This paper challenges the assumption of monolithic preferences by introducing Configurable Preference Tuning (CPT), a novel framework for endowing language models with the ability to dynamically adjust their behavior based on explicit, human-interpretable directives. CPT leverages synthetically generated preference data, conditioned on system prompts derived from structured, fine-grained rubrics that define desired attributes like writing style. By fine-tuning with these rubric-guided preferences, the LLM learns to modulate its outputs at inference time in response to the system prompt, without retraining. This approach not only offers fine-grained control but also provides a mechanism for modeling more nuanced and context-dependent human feedback. Several experimental artifacts, such as training code, generated datasets and fine-tuned models are released at https://github.com/vicgalle/configurable-preference-tuning
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2025.
Builds on
13 of 16 references.
References · 13
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learningcited by 155
- 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 132
- 2024Social Choice Should Guide AI Alignment in Dealing with Diverse Human Feedbackcited by 100
- 2024Self-Supervised Visual Preference Alignmentcited by 31
- 2023Compositional preference models for aligning LMscited by 26
- 2023A density estimation perspective on learning from pairwise human preferencescited by 23
- 2024Configurable Safety Tuning of Language Models with Synthetic Preference Datacited by 14
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.
8 papers.
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 366
- 2026JudgmentBench: Comparing Rubric and Preference Evaluation for Quality Assessmentcited by 5
- 2026ARES: Automated Rubric Synthesis for Scalable LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2026From Holistic Evaluation to Structured Criteria: Rubrics Across the Evolving LLM Landscapecited by 4
- 2025Breaking the Mirror: Activation-Based Mitigation of Self-Preference in LLM Evaluatorscited by 3
- 2026Distilling Feedback into Memory-as-a-Toolcited by 2
- 2026Configurable Reward Model for Balanced Safety Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026CM-DPO: Constraint-Margin Direct Preference Optimization for LLM Planningcited by 0
- 2026CM-DPO: Constraint-Margin Direct Preference Optimization for LLM Planning6 Oct 2026
- 2026From Holistic Evaluation to Structured Criteria: Rubrics Across the Evolving LLM Landscape7 Jun 2026
- 2026Configurable Reward Model for Balanced Safety Alignment28 May 2026
- 2026JudgmentBench: Comparing Rubric and Preference Evaluation for Quality Assessment24 May 2026
- 2026ARES: Automated Rubric Synthesis for Scalable LLM Reinforcement Learning22 May 2026
- 2026Distilling Feedback into Memory-as-a-Tool9 Jan 2026
- 2025Breaking the Mirror: Activation-Based Mitigation of Self-Preference in LLM Evaluators3 Sep 2025
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains23 Jul 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Towards Spec Learning: Inference-Time Alignment from Preference Pairs
- 2024Preference Tuning with Human Feedback on Language, Speech, and Vision Tasks: A Survey
- 2025IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier
- 2024Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback
- 2024Data-Centric Human Preference with Rationales for Direct Preference Alignment
- 2024Would I Lie To You? Inference Time Alignment of Language Models using Direct Preference Heads
- 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following
- 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier