mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Configurable Preference Tuning with Rubric-Guided Synthetic Data

arXiv 2506.11702 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Models of human feedback for AI alignment, such as those underpinning Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), often bake in a singular, static set of preferences, limiting adaptability. This paper challenges the assumption of monolithic preferences by introducing Configurable Preference Tuning (CPT), a novel framework for endowing language models with the ability to dynamically adjust their behavior based on explicit, human-interpretable directives. CPT leverages synthetically generated preference data, conditioned on system prompts derived from structured, fine-grained rubrics that define desired attributes like writing style. By fine-tuning with these rubric-guided preferences, the LLM learns to modulate its outputs at inference time in response to the system prompt, without retraining. This approach not only offers fine-grained control but also provides a mechanism for modeling more nuanced and context-dependent human feedback. Several experimental artifacts, such as training code, generated datasets and fine-tuned models are released at https://github.com/vicgalle/configurable-preference-tuning

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2025.

Builds on

13 of 16 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  4. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  5. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  6. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learningcited by 155
  7. 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 132
  8. 2024Social Choice Should Guide AI Alignment in Dealing with Diverse Human Feedbackcited by 100
  9. 2024Self-Supervised Visual Preference Alignmentcited by 31
  10. 2023Compositional preference models for aligning LMscited by 26
  11. 2023A density estimation perspective on learning from pairwise human preferencescited by 23
  12. 2024Configurable Safety Tuning of Language Models with Synthetic Preference Datacited by 14
1 more
  1. 2025Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Featurescited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards Spec Learning: Inference-Time Alignment from Preference Pairs
  2. 2024Preference Tuning with Human Feedback on Language, Speech, and Vision Tasks: A Survey
  3. 2025IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier
  4. 2024Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback
  5. 2024Data-Centric Human Preference with Rationales for Direct Preference Alignment
  6. 2024Would I Lie To You? Inference Time Alignment of Language Models using Direct Preference Heads
  7. 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following
  8. 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier