mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Symmetric Autoencoders from the Eckart-Young-Schmidt Perspective

arXiv 2506.11641 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2025math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep autoencoders have become a fundamental tool in various machine learning applications, ranging from dimensionality reduction and reduced order modeling of partial differential equations to anomaly detection and neural machine translation. Despite their empirical success, a solid theoretical foundation for their expressiveness remains elusive, particularly when compared to classical projection-based techniques. In this work, we aim to take a step forward in this direction by presenting a comprehensive analysis of what we refer to as symmetric autoencoders, a broad class of deep learning architectures that have surfaced frequently in the recent literature. Specifically, we introduce a formal distinction between different classes of symmetric architectures, analyzing their strengths and limitations from a mathematical perspective. For instance, we show that the reconstruction error of symmetric autoencoders with orthonormality constraints can be understood by leveraging the well-renowned Eckart-Young-Schmidt (EYS) theorem. As a byproduct of our analysis, we end up developing the EYS initialization strategy for symmetric autoencoders, which is based on an iterated application of the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). To validate our findings, we conduct a series of numerical experiments where we benchmark our proposal against conventional deep autoencoders, discussing the importance of model design and initialization.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2025.

Builds on

16 of 40 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  3. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
  4. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 1,000
  5. 2016End-to-end Optimized Image Compressioncited by 696
  6. 2020A comprehensive deep learning-based approach to reduced order modeling of nonlinear time-dependent parametrized PDEscited by 105
  7. 2021Convergence Rates for Learning Linear Operators from Noisy Datacited by 55
  8. 2020The gap between theory and practice in function approximation with deep neural networkscited by 54
  9. 2023A graph convolutional autoencoder approach to model order reduction for parametrized PDEscited by 44
  10. 2021Deep Learning for Reduced Order Modelling and Efficient Temporal Evolution of Fluid Simulationscited by 36
  11. 2021A Deep Learning approach to Reduced Order Modelling of Parameter Dependent Partial Differential Equationscited by 28
  12. 2023Learning Nonlinear Projections for Reduced-Order Modeling of Dynamical Systems using Constrained Autoencoderscited by 16
4 more
  1. 2019Benefits of Jointly Training Autoencoders: An Improved Neural Tangent Kernel Analysiscited by 13
  2. 2018Invertible Autoencoder for domain adaptationcited by 10
  3. 2017PCA-Initialized Deep Neural Networks Applied To Document Image Analysiscited by 6
  4. 2020Establishing strong imputation performance of a denoising autoencoder in a wide range of missing data problemscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.