Invertible Autoencoder for domain adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The unsupervised image-to-image translation aims at finding a mapping between the source (A) and target (B) image domains, where in many applications aligned image pairs are not available at training. This is an ill-posed learning problem since it requires inferring the joint probability distribution from marginals. Joint learning of coupled mappings FAB: A rightarrow B and FBA: B rightarrow A is commonly used by the state-of-the-art methods, like CycleGAN [Zhu et al., 2017], to learn this translation by introducing cycle consistency requirement to the learning problem, i.e. FAB(FBA(B)) ≈ B and FBA(FAB(A)) ≈ A. Cycle consistency enforces the preservation of the mutual information between input and translated images. However, it does not explicitly enforce FBA to be an inverse operation to FAB. We propose a new deep architecture that we call invertible autoencoder (InvAuto) to explicitly enforce this relation. This is done by forcing an encoder to be an inverted version of the decoder, where corresponding layers perform opposite mappings and share parameters. The mappings are constrained to be orthonormal. The resulting architecture leads to the reduction of the number of trainable parameters (up to 2 times). We present image translation results on benchmark data sets and demonstrate state-of-the art performance of our approach. Finally, we test the proposed domain adaptation method on the task of road video conversion. We demonstrate that the videos converted with InvAuto have high quality and show that the NVIDIA neural-network-based end-to-end learning system for autonomous driving, known as PilotNet, trained on real road videos performs well when tested on the converted ones.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
10 papers.
- 2021Benchmarking Invertible Architectures on Inverse Problemscited by 25
- 2024Mutual Information Estimation via Normalizing Flowscited by 22
- 2023Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flowscited by 17
- 2025Watermarking Autoregressive Image Generationcited by 15
- 2023Training Invertible Neural Networks as Autoencoderscited by 4
- 2025Deep Symmetric Autoencoders from the Eckart-Young-Schmidt Perspectivecited by 2
- 2026Deep Invertible Autoencoders for Dimensionality Reduction of Dynamical Systemscited by 0
- 2026Harnessing AI for Inverse Partial Differential Equation Problems: Past, Present, and Prospectscited by 0
- 2026Generalized Neural Operator for Parametric and Boundary-Value Problemscited by 0
- 2026Hybrid Lagrangian-Eulerian Model for Lagrangian Fluid Simulationcited by 0
- 2026Hybrid Lagrangian-Eulerian Model for Lagrangian Fluid Simulation2 Aug 2026
- 2026Generalized Neural Operator for Parametric and Boundary-Value Problems24 Jul 2026
- 2026Harnessing AI for Inverse Partial Differential Equation Problems: Past, Present, and Prospects16 May 2026
- 2026Deep Invertible Autoencoders for Dimensionality Reduction of Dynamical Systems13 Mar 2026
- 2025Watermarking Autoregressive Image Generation19 Jun 2025
- 2025Deep Symmetric Autoencoders from the Eckart-Young-Schmidt Perspective13 Jun 2025
- 2024Mutual Information Estimation via Normalizing Flows4 Mar 2024
- 2023Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flows2 Jun 2023
- 2023Training Invertible Neural Networks as Autoencoders20 Mar 2023
- 2021Benchmarking Invertible Architectures on Inverse Problems26 Jan 2021