Learning a Continue-Thinking Token for Enhanced Test-Time Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time scaling has emerged as an effective approach for improving language model performance by utilizing additional compute at inference time. Recent studies have shown that overriding end-of-thinking tokens (e.g., replacing "</think>" with "Wait") can extend reasoning steps and improve accuracy. In this work, we explore whether a dedicated continue-thinking token can be learned to trigger extended reasoning. We augment a distilled version of DeepSeek-R1 with a single learned "<|continue-thinking|>" token, training only its embedding via reinforcement learning while keeping the model weights frozen. Our experiments show that this learned token achieves improved accuracy on standard math benchmarks compared to both the baseline model and a test-time scaling approach that uses a fixed token (e.g., "Wait") for budget forcing. In particular, we observe that in cases where the fixed-token approach enhances the base model's accuracy, our method achieves a markedly greater improvement. For example, on the GSM8K benchmark, the fixed-token approach yields a 1.3% absolute improvement in accuracy, whereas our learned-token method achieves a 4.2% improvement over the base model that does not use budget forcing.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2025.
Builds on
20 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025L1: Controlling How Long A Reasoning Model Thinks With Reinforcement Learning6 Mar
- 2025Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimal17 Feb
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
Other references · 16
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 295
- 2024Let's Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Modelscited by 191
- 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domainscited by 156
- 2024From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Modelscited by 137
4 more
- 2023Guiding Language Model Reasoning with Planning Tokenscited by 58
- 2025Do Large Language Model Benchmarks Test Reliability?cited by 54
- 2025m1: Unleash the Potential of Test-Time Scaling for Medical Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 46
- 2025"Well, Keep Thinking": Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Injection Decodingcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Soft Tokens, Hard Truthscited by 35
- 2025What Characterizes Effective Reasoning? Revisiting Length, Review, and Structure of CoTcited by 25
- 2026Know Thy Reasoner: Not All Language Models Explore Alikecited by 0
- 2026Inject a Turn, Not a Token: Learning Where to Redirect LLM Reasoning for Self-Correctioncited by 0
- 2026Inject a Turn, Not a Token: Learning Where to Redirect LLM Reasoning for Self-Correction9 Oct 2026
- 2026Know Thy Reasoner: Not All Language Models Explore Alike12 Apr 2026
- 2025What Characterizes Effective Reasoning? Revisiting Length, Review, and Structure of CoT23 Sep 2025
- 2025Soft Tokens, Hard Truths23 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Think Twice: Enhancing LLM Reasoning by Scaling Multi-round Test-time Thinking
- 2026Prefix Sliding for efficient test-time scaling
- 2026Think Deep, Not Just Long: Measuring LLM Reasoning Effort via Deep-Thinking Tokens
- 2025Boosting Accuracy and Efficiency of Budget Forcing in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025Learning to Insert [PAUSE] Tokens for Better Reasoning
- 2025Step-level Verifier-guided Hybrid Test-Time Scaling for Large Language Models
- 2025Answer Convergence as a Signal for Early Stopping in Reasoning
- 2025Making Small Language Models Efficient Reasoners: Intervention, Supervision, Reinforcement