Evaluating BiLSTM and CNN+GRU Approaches for Human Activity Recognition Using WiFi CSI Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper compares the performance of BiLSTM and CNN+GRU deep learning models for Human Activity Recognition (HAR) on two WiFi-based Channel State Information (CSI) datasets: UT-HAR and NTU-Fi HAR. The findings indicate that the CNN+GRU model has a higher accuracy on the UT-HAR dataset (95.20%) thanks to its ability to extract spatial features. In contrast, the BiLSTM model performs better on the high-resolution NTU-Fi HAR dataset (92.05%) by extracting long-term temporal dependencies more effectively. The findings strongly emphasize the critical role of dataset characteristics and preprocessing techniques in model performance improvement. We also show the real-world applicability of such models in applications like healthcare and intelligent home systems, highlighting their potential for unobtrusive activity recognition.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.
Builds on
2 of 14 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.