mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HEIST: A Graph Foundation Model for Spatial Transcriptomics and Proteomics Data

arXiv 2506.11152 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2025q-bio.GN cs.LG q-bio.CBcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Single-cell transcriptomics and proteomics have become a great source for data-driven insights into biology, enabling the use of advanced deep learning methods to understand cellular heterogeneity and gene expression at the single-cell level. With the advent of spatial-omics data, we have the promise of characterizing cells within their tissue context as it provides both spatial coordinates and intra-cellular transcriptional or protein counts. Proteomics offers a complementary view by directly measuring proteins, which are the primary effectors of cellular function and key therapeutic targets. However, existing models either ignore the spatial information or the complex genetic and proteomic programs within cells. Thus they cannot infer how cell internal regulation adapts to microenvironmental cues. Furthermore, these models often utilize fixed gene vocabularies, hindering their generalizability unseen genes. In this paper, we introduce HEIST, a hierarchical graph transformer foundation model for spatial transcriptomics and proteomics. HEIST models tissues as hierarchical graphs. The higher level graph is a spatial cell graph, and each cell in turn, is represented by its lower level gene co-expression network graph. HEIST achieves this by performing both intra-level and cross-level message passing to utilize the hierarchy in its embeddings and can thus generalize to novel datatypes including spatial proteomics without retraining. HEIST is pretrained on 22.3M cells from 124 tissues across 15 organs using spatially-aware contrastive and masked autoencoding objectives. Unsupervised analysis of HEIST embeddings reveals spatially informed subpopulations missed by prior models. Downstream evaluations demonstrate generalizability to proteomics data and state-of-the-art performance in clinical outcome prediction, cell type annotation, and gene imputation across multiple technologies.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.

Builds on

12 of 54 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  3. 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,106
  4. 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 787
  5. 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
  6. 2021From Canonical Correlation Analysis to Self-supervised Graph Neural Networkscited by 141
  7. 2022MultiScale MeshGraphNetscited by 98
  8. 2022HOOD: Hierarchical Graphs for Generalized Modelling of Clothing Dynamicscited by 78
  9. 2022Efficient Learning of Mesh-Based Physical Simulation with BSMS-GNNcited by 45
  10. 2021An iterative clustering algorithm for the Contextual Stochastic Block Model with optimality guaranteescited by 10
  11. 2023Single Cells Are Spatial Tokens: Transformers for Spatial Transcriptomic Data Imputationcited by 7
  12. 2020Bayesian Modeling of Spatial Molecular Profiling Data via Gaussian Processcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.