mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Perception-Driven Bias Detection in Machine Learning via Crowdsourced Visual Judgment

arXiv 2506.11047 ↗First posted 21 May 2025cs.LG cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, yet they remain vulnerable to bias systematic disparities that disproportionately impact specific demographic groups. Traditional bias detection methods often depend on access to sensitive labels or rely on rigid fairness metrics, limiting their applicability in real-world settings. This paper introduces a novel, perception-driven framework for bias detection that leverages crowdsourced human judgment. Inspired by reCAPTCHA and other crowd-powered systems, we present a lightweight web platform that displays stripped-down visualizations of numeric data (for example-salary distributions across demographic clusters) and collects binary judgments on group similarity. We explore how users' visual perception-shaped by layout, spacing, and question phrasing can signal potential disparities. User feedback is aggregated to flag data segments as biased, which are then validated through statistical tests and machine learning cross-evaluations. Our findings show that perceptual signals from non-expert users reliably correlate with known bias cases, suggesting that visual intuition can serve as a powerful, scalable proxy for fairness auditing. This approach offers a label-efficient, interpretable alternative to conventional fairness diagnostics, paving the way toward human-aligned, crowdsourced bias detection pipelines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2025.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  6. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  7. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  8. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  9. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  10. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  11. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  12. 2018'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisionscited by 91
3 more
  1. 2018Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Makingcited by 66
  2. 2019FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Makingcited by 59
  3. 2018How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairnesscited by 48

Built on by

Not cited yet.