mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

NeuralNexus at BEA 2025 Shared Task: Retrieval-Augmented Prompting for Mistake Identification in AI Tutors

arXiv 2506.10627 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Agentic RAG, agents and memory

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents our system for Track 1: Mistake Identification in the BEA 2025 Shared Task on Pedagogical Ability Assessment of AI-powered Tutors. The task involves evaluating whether a tutor's response correctly identifies a mistake in a student's mathematical reasoning. We explore four approaches: (1) an ensemble of machine learning models over pooled token embeddings from multiple pretrained language models (LMs); (2) a frozen sentence-transformer using [CLS] embeddings with an MLP classifier; (3) a history-aware model with multi-head attention between token-level history and response embeddings; and (4) a retrieval-augmented few-shot prompting system with a large language model (LLM) i.e. GPT 4o. Our final system retrieves semantically similar examples, constructs structured prompts, and uses schema-guided output parsing to produce interpretable predictions. It outperforms all baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining example-driven prompting with LLM reasoning for pedagogical feedback assessment. Our code is available at https://github.com/NaumanNaeem/BEA_2025.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agentic RAG, agents and memory, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 3 of its 4 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2025.

Builds on

3 of 4 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problemscited by 131
  2. 2024Unifying AI Tutor Evaluation: An Evaluation Taxonomy for Pedagogical Ability Assessment of LLM-Powered AI Tutorscited by 61
  3. 2023Bridging the Novice-Expert Gap via Models of Decision-Making: A Case Study on Remediating Math Mistakescited by 52

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards Reward Modeling for AI Tutors in Math Mistake Remediation
  2. 2026GRADE: Generalizable Reasoning-Aware Dialogue Evaluation for AI Tutors
  3. 2026Towards Pedagogically Aligned LLM Tutors for Math Mistake Remediation
  4. 2026Knowledge Distillation for Automated AI Tutor Evaluation
  5. 2024LLMs can Find Mathematical Reasoning Mistakes by Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought
  6. 2026Catching The Correct Answer Trap: Characterising AI Tutor Blind Spots When Analysing Student Reasoning
  7. 2025MathTutorBench: A Benchmark for Measuring Open-ended Pedagogical Capabilities of LLM Tutors
  8. 2025From Correctness to Comprehension: AI Agents for Personalized Error Diagnosis in Education