NeuralNexus at BEA 2025 Shared Task: Retrieval-Augmented Prompting for Mistake Identification in AI Tutors
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Agentic RAG, agents and memory
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents our system for Track 1: Mistake Identification in the BEA 2025 Shared Task on Pedagogical Ability Assessment of AI-powered Tutors. The task involves evaluating whether a tutor's response correctly identifies a mistake in a student's mathematical reasoning. We explore four approaches: (1) an ensemble of machine learning models over pooled token embeddings from multiple pretrained language models (LMs); (2) a frozen sentence-transformer using [CLS] embeddings with an MLP classifier; (3) a history-aware model with multi-head attention between token-level history and response embeddings; and (4) a retrieval-augmented few-shot prompting system with a large language model (LLM) i.e. GPT 4o. Our final system retrieves semantically similar examples, constructs structured prompts, and uses schema-guided output parsing to produce interpretable predictions. It outperforms all baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining example-driven prompting with LLM reasoning for pedagogical feedback assessment. Our code is available at https://github.com/NaumanNaeem/BEA_2025.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agentic RAG, agents and memory, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 3 of its 4 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2025.
Builds on
3 of 4 references.
References · 3
- 2023MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problemscited by 131
- 2024Unifying AI Tutor Evaluation: An Evaluation Taxonomy for Pedagogical Ability Assessment of LLM-Powered AI Tutorscited by 61
- 2023Bridging the Novice-Expert Gap via Models of Decision-Making: A Case Study on Remediating Math Mistakescited by 52
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Towards Reward Modeling for AI Tutors in Math Mistake Remediation
- 2026GRADE: Generalizable Reasoning-Aware Dialogue Evaluation for AI Tutors
- 2026Towards Pedagogically Aligned LLM Tutors for Math Mistake Remediation
- 2026Knowledge Distillation for Automated AI Tutor Evaluation
- 2024LLMs can Find Mathematical Reasoning Mistakes by Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought
- 2026Catching The Correct Answer Trap: Characterising AI Tutor Blind Spots When Analysing Student Reasoning
- 2025MathTutorBench: A Benchmark for Measuring Open-ended Pedagogical Capabilities of LLM Tutors
- 2025From Correctness to Comprehension: AI Agents for Personalized Error Diagnosis in Education