BiVLC: Extending Vision-Language Compositionality Evaluation with Text-to-Image Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing Vision-Language Compositionality (VLC) benchmarks like SugarCrepe are formulated as image-to-text retrieval problems, where, given an image, the models need to select between the correct textual description and a synthetic hard negative text. In this work, we present the Bidirectional Vision-Language Compositionality (BiVLC) dataset. The novelty of BiVLC is to add a synthetic hard negative image generated from the synthetic text, resulting in two image-to-text retrieval examples (one for each image) and, more importantly, two text-to-image retrieval examples (one for each text). Human annotators filter out ill-formed examples ensuring the validity of the benchmark. The experiments on BiVLC uncover a weakness of current multimodal models, as they perform poorly in the text-to-image direction. In fact, when considering both retrieval directions, the conclusions obtained in previous works change significantly. In addition to the benchmark, we show that a contrastive model trained using synthetic images and texts significantly improves over the base model in SugarCrepe and in BiVLC for both retrieval directions. The gap to human performance in BiVLC confirms that Vision-Language Compositionality is still a challenging problem. BiVLC and code are available at https://imirandam.github.io/BiVLC_project_page.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2024.
Builds on
25 of 31 references.
References · 25
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 950
- 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 767
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
- 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 465
- 2023PaLI-X: On Scaling up a Multilingual Vision and Language Modelcited by 254
13 more
- 2023OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Datacited by 250
- 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 238
- 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?cited by 177
- 2023Image Captioners Are Scalable Vision Learners Toocited by 89
- 2022IGLUE: A Benchmark for Transfer Learning across Modalities, Tasks, and Languagescited by 54
- 2023COLA: A Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Retrievalcited by 53
- 2023Equivariant Similarity for Vision-Language Foundation Modelscited by 51
- 2023Revisiting the Role of Language Priors in Vision-Language Modelscited by 50
- 2022Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic Compositionalitycited by 44
- 2023Vera: A General-Purpose Plausibility Estimation Model for Commonsense Statementscited by 44
- 2023Going Beyond Nouns With Vision & Language Models Using Synthetic Datacited by 33
- 2023Enhancing Multimodal Compositional Reasoning of Visual Language Models with Generative Negative Miningcited by 25
- 2024No Filter: Cultural and Socioeconomic Diversity in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025FineLIP: Extending CLIP's Reach via Fine-Grained Alignment with Longer Text Inputscited by 23
- 2025Estimating Commonsense Plausibility through Semantic Shiftscited by 1
- 2025Adding simple structure at inference improves Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 1
- 2025Understanding Space Is Rocket Science -- Only Top Reasoning Models Can Solve Spatial Understanding Taskscited by 1
- 2026Revisiting Compositionality in Dual-Encoder Vision-Language Models: The Role of Inferencecited by 1
- 2026Token-level Response-visual Attention Guidance for Multimodal LLMs Knowledge Distillationcited by 0
- 2026Token-level Response-visual Attention Guidance for Multimodal LLMs Knowledge Distillation1 Jul 2026
- 2026Revisiting Compositionality in Dual-Encoder Vision-Language Models: The Role of Inference13 Apr 2026
- 2025Understanding Space Is Rocket Science -- Only Top Reasoning Models Can Solve Spatial Understanding Tasks2 Sep 2025
- 2025Adding simple structure at inference improves Vision-Language Compositionality11 Jun 2025
- 2025FineLIP: Extending CLIP's Reach via Fine-Grained Alignment with Longer Text Inputs2 Apr 2025
- 2025Estimating Commonsense Plausibility through Semantic Shifts19 Feb 2025