NeuroFaith: Evaluating LLM Self-Explanation Faithfulness via Internal Representation Alignment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate plausible free text self-explanations to justify their answers. However, these natural language explanations may not accurately reflect the model's actual reasoning process, pinpointing a lack of faithfulness. Existing faithfulness evaluation methods rely primarily on behavioral tests or computational block analysis without examining the semantic content of internal neural representations. This paper proposes NeuroFaith, a flexible framework that measures the faithfulness of LLM free text self-explanation by identifying key concepts within explanations and mechanistically testing whether these concepts actually influence the model's predictions. We show the versatility of NeuroFaith across 2-hop reasoning and classification tasks. Additionally, we develop a linear faithfulness probe based on NeuroFaith to detect unfaithful self-explanations from representation space and improve faithfulness through steering. NeuroFaith provides a principled approach to evaluating and enhancing the faithfulness of LLM free text self-explanations, addressing critical needs for trustworthy AI systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.
Builds on
52 of 70 references.
References · 52
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
38 more
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 916
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
- 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
- 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 257
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 235
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 218
- 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 205
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
- 2020Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationalescited by 160
- 2022Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Surveycited by 130
- 2021Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processingcited by 126
- 2024A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 118
- 2023Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanationscited by 107
- 2024Are self-explanations from Large Language Models faithful?cited by 101
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language, Image, Video and Audio Foundation Modelscited by 100
- 2024Information Flow Routes: Automatically Interpreting Language Models at Scalecited by 95
- 2023Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanationscited by 90
- 2024Hopping Too Late: Exploring the Limitations of Large Language Models on Multi-Hop Queriescited by 78
- 2023On Measuring Faithfulness or Self-consistency of Natural Language Explanationscited by 73
- 2024SelfIE: Self-Interpretation of Large Language Model Embeddingscited by 67
- 2022Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 64
- 2025Measuring Chain of Thought Faithfulness by Unlearning Reasoning Stepscited by 47
- 2025Walk the Talk? Measuring the Faithfulness of Large Language Model Explanationscited by 45
- 2024The Probabilities Also Matter: A More Faithful Metric for Faithfulness of Free-Text Explanations in Large Language Modelscited by 29
- 2024Do Large Language Models Perform Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning without Exploiting Shortcuts?cited by 28
- 2024Position: Explain to Question not to Justifycited by 20
- 2024Towards Faithful Natural Language Explanations: A Study Using Activation Patching in Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2025A Causal Lens for Evaluating Faithfulness Metricscited by 12
- 2024Self-AMPLIFY: Improving Small Language Models with Self Post Hoc Explanationscited by 8
- 2023Is Ignorance Bliss? The Role of Post Hoc Explanation Faithfulness and Alignment in Model Trust in Laypeople and Domain Expertscited by 7
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness
- 2024Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Models
- 2026A Positive Case for Faithfulness: LLM Self-Explanations Help Predict Model Behavior
- 2025Self-Critique and Refinement for Faithful Natural Language Explanations
- 2023Benchmarking Faithfulness: Towards Accurate Natural Language Explanations in Vision-Language Tasks
- 2026Can Large Language Models Still Explain Themselves? Investigating the Impact of Quantization on Self-Explanations
- 2024Enhancing Ethical Explanations of Large Language Models through Iterative Symbolic Refinement
- 2026Causally Grounded Mechanistic Interpretability for LLMs with Faithful Natural-Language Explanations