The Curious Language Model: Strategic Test-Time Information Acquisition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decision-makers often possess insufficient information to render a confident decision. In these cases, the decision-maker can often undertake actions to acquire the necessary information about the problem at hand, e.g., by consulting knowledgeable authorities or by conducting experiments. Importantly, different levers of information acquisition come with different costs, posing the challenge of selecting the actions that are both informative and cost-effective. In this work, we propose CuriosiTree, a heuristic-based, test-time policy for zero-shot information acquisition in large language models (LLMs). CuriosiTree employs a greedy tree search to estimate the expected information gain of each action and strategically chooses actions based on a balance of anticipated information gain and associated cost. Empirical validation in a clinical diagnosis simulation shows that CuriosiTree enables cost-effective integration of heterogenous sources of information, and outperforms baseline action selection strategies in selecting action sequences that enable accurate diagnosis.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.
Builds on
31 of 47 references.
References · 31
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 846
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
19 more
- 2023ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solvingcited by 276
- 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Usecited by 209
- 2023Modern Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 121
- 2024STaR-GATE: Teaching Language Models to Ask Clarifying Questionscited by 99
- 2024Modeling Future Conversation Turns to Teach LLMs to Ask Clarifying Questionscited by 70
- 2024MLR-Copilot: Autonomous Machine Learning Research based on Large Language Models Agentscited by 64
- 2024ProtAgents: Protein discovery via large language model multi-agent collaborations combining physics and machine learningcited by 63
- 2025QuestBench: Can LLMs ask the right question to acquire information in reasoning tasks?cited by 56
- 2024BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experimentscited by 49
- 2024ClimateGPT: Towards AI Synthesizing Interdisciplinary Research on Climate Changecited by 46
- 2017Ask the Right Questions: Active Question Reformulation with Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
- 2024Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instructioncited by 38
- 2022Validating Large Language Models with ReLMcited by 33
- 2024Doing Experiments and Revising Rules with Natural Language and Probabilistic Reasoningcited by 23
- 2024Learning to Ask Informative Questions: Enhancing LLMs with Preference Optimization and Expected Information Gaincited by 21
- 2024LLMs in the Imaginarium: Tool Learning through Simulated Trial and Errorcited by 19
- 2025From Selection to Generation: A Survey of LLM-based Active Learningcited by 18
- 2025A Survey on Active Feature Acquisition Strategiescited by 16
- 2024Measurement Scheduling for ICU Patients with Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025BED-LLM: Intelligent Information Gathering with LLMs and Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 21
- 2026Planning to Explore: Curiosity-Driven Planning for LLM Test Generationcited by 1
- 2026Non-Myopic Active Feature Acquisition via Pathwise Policy Gradientscited by 1
- 2026CA-BED: Conversation-Aware Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 0
- 2026Wide Learning: Learning to Reach Evidencecited by 0
- 2026Wide Learning: Learning to Reach Evidence30 Aug 2026
- 2026CA-BED: Conversation-Aware Bayesian Experimental Design31 May 2026
- 2026Non-Myopic Active Feature Acquisition via Pathwise Policy Gradients6 May 2026
- 2026Planning to Explore: Curiosity-Driven Planning for LLM Test Generation6 Apr 2026
- 2025BED-LLM: Intelligent Information Gathering with LLMs and Bayesian Experimental Design28 Aug 2025