mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Good LLM-Generated Password Policies Are?

arXiv 2506.08320 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative AI technologies, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), are rapidly being adopted across industry, academia, and government sectors, owing to their remarkable capabilities in natural language processing. However, despite their strengths, the inconsistency and unpredictability of LLM outputs present substantial challenges, especially in security-critical domains such as access control. One critical issue that emerges prominently is the consistency of LLM-generated responses, which is paramount for ensuring secure and reliable operations. In this paper, we study the application of LLMs within the context of Cybersecurity Access Control Systems. Specifically, we investigate the consistency and accuracy of LLM-generated password policies, translating natural language prompts into executable pwquality.conf configuration files. Our experimental methodology adopts two distinct approaches: firstly, we utilize pre-trained LLMs to generate configuration files purely from natural language prompts without additional guidance. Secondly, we provide these models with official pwquality.conf documentation to serve as an informative baseline. We systematically assess the soundness, accuracy, and consistency of these AI-generated configurations. Our findings underscore significant challenges in the current generation of LLMs and contribute valuable insights into refining the deployment of LLMs in Access Control Systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.

Builds on

15 of 40 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  5. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,984
  6. 2023FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Setscited by 201
  7. 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledgecited by 55
  8. 2023Consistency Analysis of ChatGPTcited by 37
  9. 2024Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: State-of-the-Artcited by 34
  10. 2024Evaluating the Consistency of LLM Evaluatorscited by 24
  11. 2025Primus: A Pioneering Collection of Open-Source Datasets for Cybersecurity LLM Trainingcited by 23
  12. 2024LLMs in Web Development: Evaluating LLM-Generated PHP Code Unveiling Vulnerabilities and Limitationscited by 22
3 more
  1. 2024Analyzing and Mitigating (with LLMs) the Security Misconfigurations of Helm Charts from Artifact Hubcited by 8
  2. 2024TruthEval: A Dataset to Evaluate LLM Truthfulness and Reliabilitycited by 7
  3. 2025Automated Consistency Analysis of LLMscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.