mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLM-BT-Terms: Back-Translation as a Framework for Terminology Standardization and Dynamic Semantic Embedding

arXiv 2506.08174 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid expansion of English technical terminology presents a significant challenge to traditional expert-based standardization, particularly in rapidly developing areas such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing. Manual approaches face difficulties in maintaining consistent multilingual terminology. To address this, we introduce LLM-BT, a back-translation framework powered by large language models (LLMs) designed to automate terminology verification and standardization through cross-lingual semantic alignment. Our key contributions include: (1) term-level consistency validation: by performing English -> intermediate language -> English back-translation, LLM-BT achieves high term consistency across different models (such as GPT-4, DeepSeek, and Grok). Case studies demonstrate over 90 percent of terms are preserved either exactly or semantically; (2) multi-path verification workflow: we develop a novel pipeline described as Retrieve -> Generate -> Verify -> Optimize, which supports both serial paths (e.g., English -> Simplified Chinese -> Traditional Chinese -> English) and parallel paths (e.g., English -> Chinese / Portuguese -> English). BLEU scores and term-level accuracy indicate strong cross-lingual robustness, with BLEU scores exceeding 0.45 and Portuguese term accuracy reaching 100 percent; (3) back-translation as semantic embedding: we reinterpret back-translation as a form of dynamic semantic embedding that uncovers latent trajectories of meaning. In contrast to static embeddings, LLM-BT offers transparent, path-based embeddings shaped by the evolution of the models. This reframing positions back-translation as an active mechanism for multilingual terminology standardization, fostering collaboration between machines and humans - machines preserve semantic integrity, while humans provide cultural interpretation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2025.

Builds on

16 of 39 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  5. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  6. 2019Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveriescited by 166
  7. 2017A Survey on Network Embeddingcited by 142
  8. 2020Rethinking embedding coupling in pre-trained language modelscited by 103
  9. 2025Scenethesis: A Language and Vision Agentic Framework for 3D Scene Generationcited by 67
  10. 2018Unsupervised Statistical Machine Translationcited by 51
  11. 2024LLMs are Also Effective Embedding Models: An In-depth Overviewcited by 32
  12. 2024When Text Embedding Meets Large Language Model: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 19
4 more
  1. 2024A semantic embedding space based on large language models for modelling human beliefscited by 9
  2. 2024SLIM-RAFT: A Novel Fine-Tuning Approach to Improve Cross-Linguistic Performance for Mercosur Common Nomenclaturecited by 3
  3. 2025The Paradox of Poetic Intent in Back-Translation: Evaluating the Quality of Large Language Models in Chinese Translationcited by 2
  4. 2025Improving Language and Modality Transfer in Translation by Character-level Modelingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.