Differentially Private Sparse Linear Regression with Heavy-tailed Responses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As a fundamental problem in machine learning and differential privacy (DP), DP linear regression has been extensively studied. However, most existing methods focus primarily on either regular data distributions or low-dimensional cases with irregular data. To address these limitations, this paper provides a comprehensive study of DP sparse linear regression with heavy-tailed responses in high-dimensional settings. In the first part, we introduce the DP-IHT-H method, which leverages the Huber loss and private iterative hard thresholding to achieve an estimation error bound of ( tildeObiggl( s^* frac1 2 · biggl(fraclog dnbiggr)^fraczeta1 + zeta + s^* frac1 + 2zeta2 + 2zeta · biggl(fraclog2 dn varepsilonbiggr)^fraczeta1 + zeta biggr) ) under the (varepsilon, δ)-DP model, where n is the sample size, d is the dimensionality, s^* is the sparsity of the parameter, and zeta ∈ (0, 1] characterizes the tail heaviness of the data. In the second part, we propose DP-IHT-L, which further improves the error bound under additional assumptions on the response and achieves ( tildeOBigl(frac(s^*)3/2 log dn varepsilonBigr). ) Compared to the first result, this bound is independent of the tail parameter zeta. Finally, through experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrate that our methods outperform standard DP algorithms designed for ``regular'' data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2025.
Builds on
26 of 59 references.
References · 26
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 186
- 2020Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Nonsmooth Convex Lossescited by 173
- 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 153
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 149
- 2018Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More Generalcited by 128
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 107
- 2020Private Mean Estimation of Heavy-Tailed Distributionscited by 73
- 2021Robust and Differentially Private Mean Estimationcited by 66
- 2017Adaptive Huber Regressioncited by 60
- 2019Average-Case Averages: Private Algorithms for Smooth Sensitivity and Mean Estimationcited by 52
- 2020On Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Heavy-tailed Datacited by 51
14 more
- 2021Improved Rates for Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Datacited by 47
- 2017Privacy Loss in Apple's Implementation of Differential Privacy on MacOS 10.12cited by 43
- 2021High Dimensional Differentially Private Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-tailed Datacited by 42
- 2014Empirical risk minimization for heavy-tailed lossescited by 37
- 2020Empirical Risk Minimization in the Non-interactive Local Model of Differential Privacycited by 16
- 2020The Cost of Privacy in Generalized Linear Models: Algorithms and Minimax Lower Boundscited by 15
- 2021Faster Rates of Private Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 12
- 2023Differentially Private Non-convex Learning for Multi-layer Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2022Differentially Private ℓ1-norm Linear Regression with Heavy-tailed Datacited by 8
- 2019A Knowledge Transfer Framework for Differentially Private Sparse Learningcited by 5
- 2025Improved Rates of Differentially Private Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimizationcited by 5
- 2023Improved Analysis of Sparse Linear Regression in Local Differential Privacy Modelcited by 4
- 2025Nearly Optimal Differentially Private ReLU Regressioncited by 3
- 2024Truthful High Dimensional Sparse Linear Regressioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.