Improving Wildlife Out-of-Distribution Detection: Africas Big Five
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mitigating human-wildlife conflict seeks to resolve unwanted encounters between these parties. Computer Vision provides a solution to identifying individuals that might escalate into conflict, such as members of the Big Five African animals. However, environments often contain several varied species. The current state-of-the-art animal classification models are trained under a closed-world assumption. They almost always remain overconfident in their predictions even when presented with unknown classes. This study investigates out-of-distribution (OOD) detection of wildlife, specifically the Big Five. To this end, we select a parametric Nearest Class Mean (NCM) and a non-parametric contrastive learning approach as baselines to take advantage of pretrained and projected features from popular classification encoders. Moreover, we compare our baselines to various common OOD methods in the literature. The results show feature-based methods reflect stronger generalisation capability across varying classification thresholds. Specifically, NCM with ImageNet pre-trained features achieves a 2%, 4% and 22% improvement on AUPR-IN, AUPR-OUT and AUTC over the best OOD methods, respectively. The code can be found here https://github.com/pxpana/BIG5OOD
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2025.
Builds on
22 of 52 references.
References · 22
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 600
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 538
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
10 more
- 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 425
- 2021SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detectioncited by 264
- 2020Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 186
- 2021DICE: Leveraging Sparsification for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 166
- 2023BioCLIP: A Vision Foundation Model for the Tree of Lifecited by 161
- 2015The Extreme Value Machinecited by 78
- 2016Towards Automatic Wild Animal Monitoring: Identification of Animal Species in Camera-trap Images using Very Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2017Wildbook: Crowdsourcing, computer vision, and data science for conservationcited by 20
- 2023Calibrated Out-of-Distribution Detection with a Generic Representationcited by 8
- 2023Beyond AUROC & co. for evaluating out-of-distribution detection performancecited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.