mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Novel, Human-in-the-Loop Computational Grounded Theory Framework for Big Social Data

arXiv 2506.06083 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2025cs.HC cs.IR cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The availability of big data has significantly influenced the possibilities and methodological choices for conducting large-scale behavioural and social science research. In the context of qualitative data analysis, a major challenge is that conventional methods require intensive manual labour and are often impractical to apply to large datasets. One effective way to address this issue is by integrating emerging computational methods to overcome scalability limitations. However, a critical concern for researchers is the trustworthiness of results when Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools are used to analyse such data. We argue that confidence in the credibility and robustness of results depends on adopting a 'human-in-the-loop' methodology that is able to provide researchers with control over the analytical process, while retaining the benefits of using ML and NLP. With this in mind, we propose a novel methodological framework for Computational Grounded Theory (CGT) that supports the analysis of large qualitative datasets, while maintaining the rigour of established Grounded Theory (GT) methodologies. To illustrate the framework's value, we present the results of testing it on a dataset collected from Reddit in a study aimed at understanding tutors' experiences in the gig economy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.

Builds on

12 of 98 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  3. 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 486
  4. 2021Hybrid Intelligencecited by 55
  5. 2024ConSiDERS-The-Human Evaluation Framework: Rethinking Human Evaluation for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 15
  6. 2024A Survey on Human-Centric LLMscited by 13
  7. 2021Supporting Serendipity: Opportunities and Challenges for Human-AI Collaboration in Qualitative Analysiscited by 11
  8. 2021A Query-Driven Topic Modelcited by 5
  9. 2023Algorithmic failure as a humanities methodology: machine learning's mispredictions identify rich cases for qualitative analysiscited by 3
  10. 2021Analysis and tuning of hierarchical topic models based on Renyi entropy approachcited by 2
  11. 2022Using Computational Grounded Theory to Understand Tutors' Experiences in the Gig Economycited by 1
  12. 2022Combining Topic Modeling with Grounded Theory: Case Studies of Project Collaborationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.