Generating Grounded Responses to Counter Misinformation via Learning Efficient Fine-Grained Critiques
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fake news and misinformation poses a significant threat to society, making efficient mitigation essential. However, manual fact-checking is costly and lacks scalability. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promise in automating counter-response generation to mitigate misinformation, but a critical challenge lies in their tendency to hallucinate non-factual information. Existing models mainly rely on LLM self-feedback to reduce hallucination, but this approach is computationally expensive. In this paper, we propose MisMitiFact, Misinformation Mitigation grounded in Facts, an efficient framework for generating fact-grounded counter-responses at scale. MisMitiFact generates simple critique feedback to refine LLM outputs, ensuring responses are grounded in evidence. We develop lightweight, fine-grained critique models trained on data sourced from readily available fact-checking sites to identify and correct errors in key elements such as numerals, entities, and topics in LLM generations. Experiments show that MisMitiFact generates counter-responses of comparable quality to LLMs' self-feedback while using significantly smaller critique models. Importantly, it achieves ~5x increase in feedback generation throughput, making it highly suitable for cost-effective, large-scale misinformation mitigation. Code and LLM prompt templates are at https://github.com/xxfwin/MisMitiFact.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.
Builds on
26 of 33 references.
References · 26
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 786
- 2021A Survey on Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 376
14 more
- 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 310
- 2020Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claimscited by 209
- 2023RL4F: Generating Natural Language Feedback with Reinforcement Learning for Repairing Model Outputscited by 104
- 2023Improving Language Models via Plug-and-Play Retrieval Feedbackcited by 87
- 2022PEER: A Collaborative Language Modelcited by 86
- 2020Overview of CheckThat! 2020: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims in Social Mediacited by 46
- 2020Evidence-based Factual Error Correctioncited by 44
- 2023Reinforcement Learning-based Counter-Misinformation Response Generation: A Case Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformationcited by 39
- 2023Explainable Claim Verification via Knowledge-Grounded Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2024JustiLM: Few-shot Justification Generation for Explainable Fact-Checking of Real-world Claimscited by 29
- 2017Fake News Mitigation via Point Process Based Interventioncited by 24
- 2022Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summaries Using Entity Retrievalcited by 8
- 2022Identifying Cost-effective Debunkers for Multi-stage Fake News Mitigation Campaignscited by 6
- 2024Harnessing Network Effect for Fake News Mitigation: Selecting Debunkers via Self-Imitation Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.