mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summaries Using Entity Retrieval

arXiv 2204.08263 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2022cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the recent advancements in abstractive summarization systems leveraged from large-scale datasets and pre-trained language models, the factual correctness of the summary is still insufficient. One line of trials to mitigate this problem is to include a post-editing process that can detect and correct factual errors in the summary. In building such a post-editing system, it is strongly required that 1) the process has a high success rate and interpretability and 2) has a fast running time. Previous approaches focus on regeneration of the summary using the autoregressive models, which lack interpretability and require high computing resources. In this paper, we propose an efficient factual error correction system RFEC based on entities retrieval post-editing process. RFEC first retrieves the evidence sentences from the original document by comparing the sentences with the target summary. This approach greatly reduces the length of text for a system to analyze. Next, RFEC detects the entity-level errors in the summaries by considering the evidence sentences and substitutes the wrong entities with the accurate entities from the evidence sentences. Experimental results show that our proposed error correction system shows more competitive performance than baseline methods in correcting the factual errors with a much faster speed.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2022.

Builds on

15 of 18 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  6. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
  7. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
  8. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
  9. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 285
  10. 2016SummaRuNNer: A Recurrent Neural Network based Sequence Model for Extractive Summarization of Documentscited by 245
  11. 2017Faithful to the Original: Fact Aware Neural Abstractive Summarizationcited by 141
  12. 2021Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarizationcited by 131
3 more
  1. 2020Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Modelscited by 108
  2. 2021Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selectioncited by 75
  3. 2020Evidence-based Factual Error Correctioncited by 44

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

8 papers.