FERRET: Private Deep Learning Faster And Better Than DPSGD
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We revisit 1-bit gradient compression through the lens of mutual-information differential privacy (MI-DP). Building on signSGD, we propose FERRET--Fast and Effective Restricted Release for Ethical Training--which transmits at most one sign bit per parameter group with Bernoulli masking. Theory: We prove each fired group leaks at most ln 2 nats; after subsampling with rate s, the total privacy loss of G groups trained for T steps with firing probability p is epsilon = G * T * s * p * ln 2. Thus FERRET achieves MI-DP for epsilon in [0.1, 2] without additive noise. Practice: We evaluate three granularities--FERRET-MAX (finest), FERRET-EIGHTH (medium), and FERRET-2 (coarsest)--on five LLMs (137M-1.8B parameters) against DPSGD and Non-DP baselines. All methods trained for 1, 3, and 5 epochs. Utility: Across all settings, FERRET-MAX/EIGHTH beat DPSGD's perplexity. At epsilon=0.5, 5 epochs: FERRET-EIGHTH achieves 3.98 perplexity vs DPSGD's 11.61 (2.9x better), within 23% of Non-DP (3.25). Privacy: MI-AUC stays at chance for FERRET-MAX/EIGHTH (~0.51), matching DPSGD vs Non-DP's 0.76-0.99. FERRET-2 shows higher leakage (~0.55) due to lower headroom. Efficiency: Stricter budgets fire fewer signs, so FERRET uses 19-33% of DPSGD's training time and only 34-36% of Non-DP training time. Take-away: Sign-based MI-DP gets closer to achieving all three qualities of the privacy, utility, performance trilemma: FERRET trains up to 5x faster, achieves 3x lower perplexity compared to DPSGD and 1.2x greater than Non-DP, all while providing formal, mathematically provable privacy guarantees using zero additive noise. The results also show that, in certain instances, masked 1-bit updates can match non-private training utility while safeguarding data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.
Builds on
7 of 16 references.
References · 7
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 571
- 2019Error Feedback Fixes SignSGD and other Gradient Compression Schemescited by 310
- 2022Differentially Private Optimization on Large Model at Small Costcited by 65
- 2016Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information Constraintcited by 45
- 2021DP-SIGNSGD: When Efficiency Meets Privacy and Robustnesscited by 11
- 2018Sign-Full Random Projectionscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022A Differentially Private Framework for Deep Learning with Convexified Loss Functions
- 2026Privacy Enhanced PEFT: Tensor Train Decomposition Improves Privacy Utility Tradeoffs under DP-SGD
- 2023Discriminative Adversarial Privacy: Balancing Accuracy and Membership Privacy in Neural Networks
- 2026Escaping Iterative Parameter-Space Noise: Differentially Private Learning with a Hypernetwork
- 2022Directional Privacy for Deep Learning
- 2025Bits for Privacy: Evaluating Post-Training Quantization via Membership Inference
- 2024Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights
- 2025An Improved Privacy and Utility Analysis of Differentially Private SGD with Bounded Domain and Smooth Losses