mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FERRET: Private Deep Learning Faster And Better Than DPSGD

arXiv 2506.05416 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We revisit 1-bit gradient compression through the lens of mutual-information differential privacy (MI-DP). Building on signSGD, we propose FERRET--Fast and Effective Restricted Release for Ethical Training--which transmits at most one sign bit per parameter group with Bernoulli masking. Theory: We prove each fired group leaks at most ln 2 nats; after subsampling with rate s, the total privacy loss of G groups trained for T steps with firing probability p is epsilon = G * T * s * p * ln 2. Thus FERRET achieves MI-DP for epsilon in [0.1, 2] without additive noise. Practice: We evaluate three granularities--FERRET-MAX (finest), FERRET-EIGHTH (medium), and FERRET-2 (coarsest)--on five LLMs (137M-1.8B parameters) against DPSGD and Non-DP baselines. All methods trained for 1, 3, and 5 epochs. Utility: Across all settings, FERRET-MAX/EIGHTH beat DPSGD's perplexity. At epsilon=0.5, 5 epochs: FERRET-EIGHTH achieves 3.98 perplexity vs DPSGD's 11.61 (2.9x better), within 23% of Non-DP (3.25). Privacy: MI-AUC stays at chance for FERRET-MAX/EIGHTH (~0.51), matching DPSGD vs Non-DP's 0.76-0.99. FERRET-2 shows higher leakage (~0.55) due to lower headroom. Efficiency: Stricter budgets fire fewer signs, so FERRET uses 19-33% of DPSGD's training time and only 34-36% of Non-DP training time. Take-away: Sign-based MI-DP gets closer to achieving all three qualities of the privacy, utility, performance trilemma: FERRET trains up to 5x faster, achieves 3x lower perplexity compared to DPSGD and 1.2x greater than Non-DP, all while providing formal, mathematically provable privacy guarantees using zero additive noise. The results also show that, in certain instances, masked 1-bit updates can match non-private training utility while safeguarding data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.

Builds on

7 of 16 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 571
  3. 2019Error Feedback Fixes SignSGD and other Gradient Compression Schemescited by 310
  4. 2022Differentially Private Optimization on Large Model at Small Costcited by 65
  5. 2016Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information Constraintcited by 45
  6. 2021DP-SIGNSGD: When Efficiency Meets Privacy and Robustnesscited by 11
  7. 2018Sign-Full Random Projectionscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022A Differentially Private Framework for Deep Learning with Convexified Loss Functions
  2. 2026Privacy Enhanced PEFT: Tensor Train Decomposition Improves Privacy Utility Tradeoffs under DP-SGD
  3. 2023Discriminative Adversarial Privacy: Balancing Accuracy and Membership Privacy in Neural Networks
  4. 2026Escaping Iterative Parameter-Space Noise: Differentially Private Learning with a Hypernetwork
  5. 2022Directional Privacy for Deep Learning
  6. 2025Bits for Privacy: Evaluating Post-Training Quantization via Membership Inference
  7. 2024Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights
  8. 2025An Improved Privacy and Utility Analysis of Differentially Private SGD with Bounded Domain and Smooth Losses