mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ProRefine: Inference-Time Prompt Refinement with Textual Feedback

arXiv 2506.05305 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic workflows, where multiple AI agents collaborate to accomplish complex tasks like reasoning or planning, play a substantial role in many cutting-edge commercial applications, and continue to fascinate researchers across fields for their potential to accomplish expensive, complex tasks that, until recently, only humans have been trusted to do. These workflows depend critically on the prompts used to provide the roles models play in such workflows. Poorly designed prompts that fail even slightly to guide individual agents can lead to sub-optimal performance that may snowball within a system of agents, limiting their reliability and scalability. To address this important problem of inference-time prompt optimization, we introduce ProRefine, an innovative inference-time optimization method that uses an agentic loop of LLMs to generate and apply textual feedback. ProRefine dynamically refines prompts for multi-step reasoning tasks without additional training or ground truth labels. Evaluated on five benchmark mathematical reasoning datasets, ProRefine significantly surpasses zero-shot Chain-of-Thought baselines by 3 to 37 percentage points. This approach not only boosts accuracy but also allows smaller models to approach the performance of their larger counterparts. This highlights its potential for building more cost-effective and powerful hybrid AI systems, thereby democratizing access to high-performing AI.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 51 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

Builds on

51 of 61 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Multi-Agent Design: Optimizing Agents with Better Prompts and Topologies4 Feb
  2. 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents14 Oct
  3. 2024Recursive Introspection: Teaching Language Model Agents How to Self-Improve25 Jul

Other references · 48

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  7. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  8. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  9. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  10. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  11. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  12. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
36 more
  1. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  2. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
  3. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
  4. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
  5. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
  6. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
  7. 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
  8. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
  9. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
  10. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 650
  11. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
  12. 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 380
  13. 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 366
  14. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 326
  15. 2024TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Textcited by 273
  16. 2024Reinforcement learningcited by 247
  17. 2024LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Taskscited by 243
  18. 2022Re3: Generating Longer Stories With Recursive Reprompting and Revisioncited by 193
  19. 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 144
  20. 2023RL4F: Generating Natural Language Feedback with Reinforcement Learning for Repairing Model Outputscited by 105
  21. 2022PEER: A Collaborative Language Modelcited by 86
  22. 2023Ethical Reasoning over Moral Alignment: A Case and Framework for In-Context Ethical Policies in LLMscited by 64
  23. 2024Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challengescited by 37
  24. 2025Reward Is Enough: LLMs Are In-Context Reinforcement Learnerscited by 31
  25. 2024Deciphering the Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Chain-of-Thought: Probability, Memorization, and Noisy Reasoningcited by 27
  26. 2024Learning to Refine with Fine-Grained Natural Language Feedbackcited by 27
  27. 2024Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning for Aligning Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 24
  28. 2023LLaMA Rider: Spurring Large Language Models to Explore the Open Worldcited by 21
  29. 2023PACE: Improving Prompt with Actor-Critic Editing for Large Language Modelcited by 20
  30. 2023Vicarious Offense and Noise Audit of Offensive Speech Classifiers: Unifying Human and Machine Disagreement on What is Offensivecited by 16
  31. 2025Evolving LLMs' Self-Refinement Capability via Synergistic Training-Inference Optimizationcited by 16
  32. 2025RL of Thoughts: Navigating LLM Reasoning with Inference-time Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  33. 2025DebFlow: Automating Agent Creation via Agent Debatecited by 10
  34. 2024MC-NEST: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models leveraging a Monte Carlo Self-Refine Treecited by 7
  35. 2024Promptly Predicting Structures: The Return of Inferencecited by 4
  36. 2024EEVEE: An Easy Annotation Tool for Natural Language Processingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025On the Role of Feedback in Test-Time Scaling of Agentic AI Workflows
  2. 2025MARS: Multi-Agent Adaptive Reasoning with Socratic Guidance for Automated Prompt Optimization
  3. 2026ContraPrompt: Contrastive Prompt Optimization via Dyadic Reasoning Trace Analysis
  4. 2026Recursive Agentic Reasoning
  5. 2026The Optimizer Is the Agent: Reasoning-Driven Search across Prompts, Programs, and ML Workflows
  6. 2026Thinking Before Thinking: Scaling Agentic Inference Through Meta-Reasoning
  7. 2026Agent-GWO: Collaborative Agents for Dynamic Prompt Optimization in Large Language Models
  8. 2025MAPRO: Recasting Multi-Agent Prompt Optimization as Maximum a Posteriori Inference