mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Just a Scratch: Enhancing LLM Capabilities for Self-harm Detection through Intent Differentiation and Emoji Interpretation

arXiv 2506.05073 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-harm detection on social media is critical for early intervention and mental health support, yet remains challenging due to the subtle, context-dependent nature of such expressions. Identifying self-harm intent aids suicide prevention by enabling timely responses, but current large language models (LLMs) struggle to interpret implicit cues in casual language and emojis. This work enhances LLMs' comprehension of self-harm by distinguishing intent through nuanced language-emoji interplay. We present the Centennial Emoji Sensitivity Matrix (CESM-100), a curated set of 100 emojis with contextual self-harm interpretations and the Self-Harm Identification aNd intent Extraction with Supportive emoji sensitivity (SHINES) dataset, offering detailed annotations for self-harm labels, casual mentions (CMs), and serious intents (SIs). Our unified framework: a) enriches inputs using CESM-100; b) fine-tunes LLMs for multi-task learning: self-harm detection (primary) and CM/SI span detection (auxiliary); c) generates explainable rationales for self-harm predictions. We evaluate the framework on three state-of-the-art LLMs-Llama 3, Mental-Alpaca, and MentalLlama, across zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuned scenarios. By coupling intent differentiation with contextual cues, our approach commendably enhances LLM performance in both detection and explanation tasks, effectively addressing the inherent ambiguity in self-harm signals. The SHINES dataset, CESM-100 and codebase are publicly available at: https://www.iitp.ac.in/~ai-nlp-ml/resources.html#SHINES .

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

Builds on

9 of 37 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  2. 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 404
  3. 2020Recognizing Emotion Cause in Conversationscited by 66
  4. 2023Training Models to Generate, Recognize, and Reframe Unhelpful Thoughtscited by 31
  5. 2024Risks from Language Models for Automated Mental Healthcare: Ethics and Structure for Implementationcited by 27
  6. 2024Looking Right is Sometimes Right: Investigating the Capabilities of Decoder-only LLMs for Sequence Labelingcited by 24
  7. 2023Boosting Distress Support Dialogue Responses with Motivational Interviewing Strategycited by 15
  8. 2023Revisiting Instruction Fine-tuned Model Evaluation to Guide Industrial Applicationscited by 11
  9. 2023Testing the Limits of Unified Sequence to Sequence LLM Pretraining on Diverse Table Data Taskscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.