mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fine-Grained Interpretation of Political Opinions in Large Language Models

arXiv 2506.04774 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Probing deception, bias and beliefs

Abstract (arXiv)

Studies of LLMs' political opinions mainly rely on evaluations of their open-ended responses. Recent work indicates that there is a misalignment between LLMs' responses and their internal intentions. This motivates us to probe LLMs' internal mechanisms and help uncover their internal political states. Additionally, we found that the analysis of LLMs' political opinions often relies on single-axis concepts, which can lead to concept confounds. In this work, we extend the single-axis to multi-dimensions and apply interpretable representation engineering techniques for more transparent LLM political concept learning. Specifically, we designed a four-dimensional political learning framework and constructed a corresponding dataset for fine-grained political concept vector learning. These vectors can be used to detect and intervene in LLM internals. Experiments are conducted on eight open-source LLMs with three representation engineering techniques. Results show these vectors can disentangle political concept confounds. Detection tasks validate the semantic meaning of the vectors and show good generalization and robustness in OOD settings. Intervention Experiments show these vectors can intervene in LLMs to generate responses with different political leanings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Probing deception, bias and beliefs, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Detecting Strategic Deception Using Linear Probes5 Feb

Other references · 21

  1. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
  2. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  3. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
  4. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  5. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
  6. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
  7. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  8. 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 712
  9. 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 199
  10. 2025Auditing language models for hidden objectivescited by 83
  11. 2024LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Querycited by 82
  12. 2024Uncovering Safety Risks of Large Language Models through Concept Activation Vectorcited by 67
9 more
  1. 2024pyvene: A Library for Understanding and Improving PyTorch Models via Interventionscited by 54
  2. 2024Designing a Dashboard for Transparency and Control of Conversational AIcited by 46
  3. 2025A Unified Understanding and Evaluation of Steering Methodscited by 46
  4. 2024Towards Reliable Evaluation of Behavior Steering Interventions in LLMscited by 36
  5. 2024Towards Unifying Interpretability and Control: Evaluation via Interventioncited by 32
  6. 2024Beyond Single Concept Vector: Modeling Concept Subspace in LLMs with Gaussian Distributioncited by 27
  7. 2025Emergence of polarization in networks of large language model agentscited by 26
  8. 2025Unmasking Implicit Bias: Evaluating Persona-Prompted LLM Responses in Power-Disparate Social Scenarioscited by 26
  9. 2024Strategic Demonstration Selection for Improved Fairness in LLM In-Context Learningcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Steering Towards Fairness: Mitigating Political Bias in LLMs
  2. 2024The Political Preferences of LLMs
  3. 2026LLM-Ideoplasticity: Measuring Ideological Plasticity in the Political Behavior of LLMs as a Context-Conditioned Distribution
  4. 2025When Models Refuse: Political Steerability and Feature Richness as Measures of Ideological Depth
  5. 2025Linear Representations of Political Perspective Emerge in Large Language Models
  6. 2025PReSS: An Automated Black-Box Framework for Evaluating Political Stance Stability in LLMs
  7. 2026Graph-Augmented LLMs for Swiss MP Ideology Prediction
  8. 2025Better Aligned with Survey Respondents or Training Data? Unveiling Political Leanings of LLMs on U.S. Supreme Court Cases