mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

"Don't Do That!": Guiding Embodied Systems through Large Language Model-based Constraint Generation

arXiv 2506.04500 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2025cs.AI cs.ROcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have spurred interest in robotic navigation that incorporates complex spatial, mathematical, and conditional constraints from natural language into the planning problem. Such constraints can be informal yet highly complex, making it challenging to translate into a formal description that can be passed on to a planning algorithm. In this paper, we propose STPR, a constraint generation framework that uses LLMs to translate constraints (expressed as instructions on ``what not to do'') into executable Python functions. STPR leverages the LLM's strong coding capabilities to shift the problem description from language into structured and interpretable code, thus circumventing complex reasoning and avoiding potential hallucinations. We show that these LLM-generated functions accurately describe even complex mathematical constraints, and apply them to point cloud representations with traditional search algorithms. Experiments in a simulated Gazebo environment show that STPR ensures full compliance across several constraints and scenarios, while having short runtimes. We also verify that STPR can be used with smaller code LLMs, making it applicable to a wide range of compact models with low inference cost.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.

Builds on

25 of 39 references.

References · 25

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  4. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  5. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  6. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  7. 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,210
  8. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
  9. 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 941
  10. 2023VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Modelscited by 750
  11. 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 611
  12. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 501
13 more
  1. 2024Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGIcited by 127
  2. 2024Granite Code Models: A Family of Open Foundation Models for Code Intelligencecited by 117
  3. 2023AutoTAMP: Autoregressive Task and Motion Planning with LLMs as Translators and Checkerscited by 113
  4. 2023Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 70
  5. 2014Informed RRT*: Optimal Sampling-based Path Planning Focused via Direct Sampling of an Admissible Ellipsoidal Heuristiccited by 50
  6. 2024Planning Anything with Rigor: General-Purpose Zero-Shot Planning with LLM-based Formalized Programmingcited by 35
  7. 2024DELTA: Decomposed Efficient Long-Term Robot Task Planning using Large Language Modelscited by 33
  8. 2024Thought of Search: Planning with Language Models Through The Lens of Efficiencycited by 32
  9. 2024Trust the PRoC3S: Solving Long-Horizon Robotics Problems with LLMs and Constraint Satisfactioncited by 19
  10. 2014Asymptotically Optimal Sampling-based Kinodynamic Planningcited by 17
  11. 2024Fast and Accurate Task Planning using Neuro-Symbolic Language Models and Multi-level Goal Decompositioncited by 14
  12. 2024CaStL: Constraints as Specifications through LLM Translation for Long-Horizon Task and Motion Planningcited by 10
  13. 2013Asymptotically near-optimal RRT for fast, high-quality, motion planningcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.