mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FailureSensorIQ: A Multi-Choice QA Dataset for Understanding Sensor Relationships and Failure Modes

arXiv 2506.03278 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce FailureSensorIQ, a novel Multi-Choice Question-Answering (MCQA) benchmarking system designed to assess the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason and understand complex, domain-specific scenarios in Industry 4.0. Unlike traditional QA benchmarks, our system focuses on multiple aspects of reasoning through failure modes, sensor data, and the relationships between them across various industrial assets. Through this work, we envision a paradigm shift where modeling decisions are not only data-driven using statistical tools like correlation analysis and significance tests, but also domain-driven by specialized LLMs which can reason about the key contributors and useful patterns that can be captured with feature engineering. We evaluate the Industrial knowledge of over a dozen LLMs-including GPT-4, Llama, and Mistral-on FailureSensorIQ from different lens using Perturbation-Uncertainty-Complexity analysis, Expert Evaluation study, Asset-Specific Knowledge Gap analysis, ReAct agent using external knowledge-bases. Even though closed-source models with strong reasoning capabilities approach expert-level performance, the comprehensive benchmark reveals a significant drop in performance that is fragile to perturbations, distractions, and inherent knowledge gaps in the models. We also provide a real-world case study of how LLMs can drive the modeling decisions on 3 different failure prediction datasets related to various assets. We release: (a) expert-curated MCQA for various industrial assets, (b) FailureSensorIQ benchmark and Hugging Face leaderboard based on MCQA built from non-textual data found in ISO documents, and (c) LLMFeatureSelector, an LLM-based feature selection scikit-learn pipeline. The software is available at https://github.com/IBM/FailureSensorIQ.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.

Builds on

33 of 50 references.

References · 33

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  5. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  7. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  8. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  9. 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
  10. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  11. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
  12. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
21 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 486
  2. 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 373
  3. 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 203
  4. 2024BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languagescited by 173
  5. 2024Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Compositioncited by 152
  6. 2024Benchmarking LLMs via Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 126
  7. 2023ReST meets ReAct: Self-Improvement for Multi-Step Reasoning LLM Agentcited by 81
  8. 2024Large Language Models Can Automatically Engineer Features for Few-Shot Tabular Learningcited by 81
  9. 2024CiteME: Can Language Models Accurately Cite Scientific Claims?cited by 48
  10. 2024BMRetriever: Tuning Large Language Models as Better Biomedical Text Retrieverscited by 38
  11. 2024LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Modelscited by 30
  12. 2024Are Large Language Models Good Statisticians?cited by 27
  13. 2024Automating Dataset Updates Towards Reliable and Timely Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 15
  14. 2024DiReCT: Diagnostic Reasoning for Clinical Notes via Large Language Modelscited by 14
  15. 2024PertEval: Unveiling Real Knowledge Capacity of LLMs with Knowledge-Invariant Perturbationscited by 13
  16. 2024TrustUQA: A Trustful Framework for Unified Structured Data Question Answeringcited by 12
  17. 2024Is Your Large Language Model Knowledgeable or a Choices-Only Cheater?cited by 12
  18. 2021Predictive Maintenance for General Aviation Using Convolutional Transformerscited by 6
  19. 2023Large Language Models for Failure Mode Classification: An Investigationcited by 6
  20. 2022Human-in-the-Loop Large-Scale Predictive Maintenance of Workstationscited by 3
  21. 2024Are Clinical T5 Models Better for Clinical Text?cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Knowledge Graph-Guided Multi-Agent Distillation for Reliable Industrial Question Answering with Datasets
  2. 2026Retrieval-based and Fine-tuned LLM Approaches for Industrial Asset Health Monitoring and Decision Support ↗
  3. 2025MSCoRe: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Collaborative Reasoning in LLM Agents
  4. 2025Reasoning Models are Test Exploiters: Rethinking Multiple-Choice
  5. 2025KG-MuLQA: A Framework for KG-based Multi-Level QA Extraction and Long-Context LLM Evaluation
  6. 2024Compound-QA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Compound Questions
  7. 2026ReasonTabQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Table Question Answering from Real World Industrial Scenarios
  8. 2024Hierarchical Deconstruction of LLM Reasoning: A Graph-Based Framework for Analyzing Knowledge Utilization