Asymmetry by Design: Boosting Cyber Defenders with Differential Access to AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI-enabled cyber capabilities become more advanced, we propose "differential access" as a strategy to tilt the cybersecurity balance toward defense by shaping access to these capabilities. We introduce three possible approaches that form a continuum, becoming progressively more restrictive for higher-risk capabilities: Promote Access, Manage Access, and Deny by Default. However, a key principle across all approaches is the need to prioritize defender access, even in the most restrictive scenarios, so that defenders can prepare for adversaries gaining access to similar capabilities. This report provides a process to help frontier AI developers choose and implement one of the three differential access approaches, including considerations based on a model's cyber capabilities, a defender's maturity and role, and strategic and technical implementation details. We also present four example schemes for defenders to reference, demonstrating how differential access provides value across various capability and defender levels, and suggest directions for further research.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 May 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025STREAM (ChemBio): A Standard for Transparently Reporting Evaluations in AI Model Reportscited by 10
- 2026Strategic commitments shape collective cybersecurity under AI inequalitycited by 1
- 2026Sovereign by necessity? Frontier AI export controls, cyber security, and the limits of national AI capabilitycited by 0
- 2026Sovereign by necessity? Frontier AI export controls, cyber security, and the limits of national AI capability13 Aug 2026
- 2026Strategic commitments shape collective cybersecurity under AI inequality10 May 2026
- 2025STREAM (ChemBio): A Standard for Transparently Reporting Evaluations in AI Model Reports13 Aug 2025