Unified Scaling Laws for Compressed Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scaling laws have shaped recent advances in machine learning by enabling predictable scaling of model performance based on model size, computation, and data volume. Concurrently, the rise in computational cost for AI has motivated model compression techniques, notably quantization and sparsification, which have emerged to mitigate the steep computational demands associated with large-scale training and inference. This paper investigates the interplay between scaling laws and compression formats, exploring whether a unified scaling framework can accurately predict model performance when training occurs over various compressed representations, such as sparse, scalar-quantized, sparse-quantized or even vector-quantized formats. Our key contributions include validating a general scaling law formulation and showing that it is applicable both individually but also composably across compression types. Based on this, our main finding is demonstrating both theoretically and empirically that there exists a simple "capacity" metric -- based on the representation's ability to fit random Gaussian data -- which can robustly predict parameter efficiency across multiple compressed representations. On the practical side, we extend our formulation to directly compare the accuracy potential of different compressed formats, and to derive better algorithms for training over sparse-quantized formats.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
28 of 34 references.
References · 28
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 841
- 2021A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inferencecited by 815
- 2019Learned Step Size Quantizationcited by 628
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
- 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 527
16 more
- 2022Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Modelscited by 253
- 2018On the Convergence of A Class of Adam-Type Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 174
- 2020A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagradcited by 171
- 2023Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling Lawscited by 159
- 2024Scaling Laws for Precisioncited by 95
- 2018On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 91
- 2025ParetoQ: Improving Scaling Laws in Extremely Low-bit LLM Quantizationcited by 46
- 2023Scaling Laws for Sparsely-Connected Foundation Modelscited by 43
- 2024LDAdam: Adaptive Optimization from Low-Dimensional Gradient Statisticscited by 38
- 2020Quantized Adam with Error Feedbackcited by 27
- 2025QuEST: Stable Training of LLMs with 1-Bit Weights and Activationscited by 22
- 2024MicroAdam: Accurate Adaptive Optimization with Low Space Overhead and Provable Convergencecited by 19
- 2024Effective Interplay between Sparsity and Quantization: From Theory to Practicecited by 19
- 2025Compression Scaling Laws:Unifying Sparsity and Quantizationcited by 11
- 2025Scaling Laws for Floating Point Quantization Trainingcited by 8
- 2022Analysis of Error Feedback in Federated Non-Convex Optimization with Biased Compressioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025CAGE: Curvature-Aware Gradient Estimation For Accurate Quantization-Aware Trainingcited by 4
- 2026GPTQ-intrinsic LoRA: A Near-optimal Algorithm for Low-precision Quantization with Low-rank Adaptationcited by 1
- 2026Limits of Reliability and Scaling in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Capability Scaling-Down Laws for LLM Compressioncited by 0
- 2026Mixed Precision Scaling Laws for Quantized Pretrainingcited by 0
- 2026Mixed Precision Scaling Laws for Quantized Pretraining13 Oct 2026
- 2026Capability Scaling-Down Laws for LLM Compression1 Oct 2026
- 2026GPTQ-intrinsic LoRA: A Near-optimal Algorithm for Low-precision Quantization with Low-rank Adaptation31 May 2026
- 2026Limits of Reliability and Scaling in Language Models8 May 2026
- 2025CAGE: Curvature-Aware Gradient Estimation For Accurate Quantization-Aware Training21 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Scaling Laws For Mixed Quantization
- 2025Efficient compression of neural networks and datasets
- 2025How to Upscale Neural Networks with Scaling Law? A Survey and Practical Guidelines
- 2025Generalizing Scaling Laws for Dense and Sparse Large Language Models
- 2026Big2Small: A Unifying Neural Network Framework for Model Compression
- 2022Combining Compressions for Multiplicative Size Scaling on Natural Language Tasks
- 2026Hyperparameter Scaling Laws Across MoE Sparsity
- 2023Towards Optimal Compression: Joint Pruning and Quantization