Scaling Laws For Mixed Quantization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-training quantization of Large Language Models (LLMs) has proven effective in reducing the memory and computational requirements for inference. In this study, we focus on a straightforward question: When aiming for a target accuracy or perplexity with low-precision quantization, how much high-precision computation needs to be preserved, and how fine-grained this quantization would need to be as we scale LLMs to larger sizes? We first introduce two critical metrics, named the quantization ratio (Qr) and quantization block size (Qb). The former measures the number of parameters quantized to low-precision arithmetic normalized by the total parameter count, whereas the latter defines the number of values within a block that share a scaling factor, akin to the block size concept introduced in the FP4 format in NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture. Through extensive and carefully controlled experiments across different models and quantization methods, we propose a unified scaling law on post-training quantization (PTQ) that can predict loss degeneration for varying Qr and Qb. For Qr, our scaling law implies that parameter scaling and ratio scaling have a multiplicative relationship. Consequently, larger models are more amenable to a higher quantization ratio Qr, thus supporting an increase in the adoption of mixed quantization for inference. Regarding Qb, our findings indicate that a small block size, similar to that used in Blackwell, is not essential for large models. Employing a small Qb can instead unnecessarily complicate the design of the hardware circuit.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.
Builds on
29 of 53 references.
References · 29
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
- 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,386
- 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,298
- 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
- 2024QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMscited by 634
- 2024SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotationscited by 471
17 more
- 2023OmniQuant: Omnidirectionally Calibrated Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 424
- 2023QuIP: 2-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models With Guaranteescited by 414
- 2023SpQR: A Sparse-Quantized Representation for Near-Lossless LLM Weight Compressioncited by 367
- 2024Extreme Compression of Large Language Models via Additive Quantizationcited by 232
- 2022Outlier Suppression: Pushing the Limit of Low-bit Transformer Language Modelscited by 181
- 2024QTIP: Quantization with Trellises and Incoherence Processingcited by 91
- 2021VS-Quant: Per-vector Scaled Quantization for Accurate Low-Precision Neural Network Inferencecited by 64
- 2024FlightLLM: Efficient Large Language Model Inference with a Complete Mapping Flow on FPGAscited by 64
- 2024SliM-LLM: Salience-Driven Mixed-Precision Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 63
- 2024Any-Precision LLM: Low-Cost Deployment of Multiple, Different-Sized LLMscited by 54
- 2023With Shared Microexponents, A Little Shifting Goes a Long Waycited by 50
- 2024LQER: Low-Rank Quantization Error Reconstruction for LLMscited by 41
- 2023Transformer-VQ: Linear-Time Transformers via Vector Quantizationcited by 26
- 2019Mixed Precision Training With 8-bit Floating Pointcited by 23
- 2024Learning from Students: Applying t-Distributions to Explore Accurate and Efficient Formats for LLMscited by 18
- 2024TernaryLLM: Ternarized Large Language Modelcited by 17
- 2023Revisiting Block-based Quantisation: What is Important for Sub-8-bit LLM Inference?cited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMscited by 48
- 2026Mixed Precision Scaling Laws for Quantized Pretrainingcited by 0
- 2026Mixed Precision Scaling Laws for Quantized Pretraining13 Oct 2026
- 2024Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMs11 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Scaling Laws for Post Training Quantized Large Language Models
- 2024Scaling Laws for Precision
- 2024Post Training Quantization of Large Language Models with Microscaling Formats
- 2024Low-Bit Quantization Favors Undertrained LLMs: Scaling Laws for Quantized LLMs with 100T Training Tokens
- 2025Scaling Law for Quantization-Aware Training
- 2025PTQ1.61: Push the Real Limit of Extremely Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization Methods for Large Language Models
- 2026D2Quant: Accurate Low-bit Post-Training Weight Quantization for LLMs
- 2025Compression Scaling Laws:Unifying Sparsity and Quantization