SPEAR: Security Posture Evaluation using AI Planner-Reasoning on Attack-Connectivity Hypergraphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph-based frameworks are often used in network hardening to help a cyber defender understand how a network can be attacked and how the best defenses can be deployed. However, incorporating network connectivity parameters in the attack graph, reasoning about the attack graph when we do not have access to complete information, providing system administrator suggestions in an understandable format, and allowing them to do what-if analysis on various scenarios and attacker motives is still missing. We fill this gap by presenting SPEAR, a formal framework with tool support for security posture evaluation and analysis that keeps human-in-the-loop. SPEAR uses the causal formalism of AI planning to model vulnerabilities and configurations in a networked system. It automatically converts network configurations and vulnerability descriptions into planning models expressed in the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL). SPEAR identifies a set of diverse security hardening strategies that can be presented in a manner understandable to the domain expert. These allow the administrator to explore the network hardening solution space in a systematic fashion and help evaluate the impact and compare the different solutions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
4 of 40 references.
References · 4
- 2023Can LLMs Fix Issues with Reasoning Models? Towards More Likely Models for AI Planningcited by 8
- 2020Multiple Plans are Better than One: Diverse Stochastic Planningcited by 5
- 2023Risk Assessment Graphs: Utilizing Attack Graphs for Risk Assessmentcited by 2
- 2023GRASP: Accelerating Shortest Path Attacks via Graph Attentioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.