mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMs

arXiv 2506.00569 ↗First posted 31 May 2025cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

When aligning large language models (LLMs), their performance on various tasks (such as being helpful, harmless, and honest) depends heavily on the composition of their training data. However, selecting a data mixture that achieves strong performance across all tasks is challenging. Existing approaches rely on large ablation studies, heuristics, or human intuition, but these can be prohibitively expensive and suboptimal. We study this problem in the setting of preference optimization via DPO and introduce AutoMixAlign (AMA), a theoretically-grounded algorithm that adaptively mixes datasets during training to balance performance across tasks. AMA first trains textitspecialist models for each task to determine losses that correspond to strong task performance. Then, it trains a generalist model using a novel minimax optimization that prioritizes tasks for which generalist model losses deviate most from specialist model losses. To optimize this problem, we propose two algorithms: (1) AMA-R, which adaptively reweights the objective to prioritize tasks, and (2) AMA-S, which adaptively adjusts how much data is sampled from each task to prioritize tasks. Both algorithms achieve a convergence rate of O(1/√T) in the convex case. AMA-R's convergence result follows from Sagawa et al. (2019), and we provide a convergence proof for AMA-S using online learning techniques such as EXP3. We evaluate AMA on several multitask alignment setups and find that AMA outperforms the standard alignment approach -- which simply optimizes the total loss across all tasks -- and also outperforms model merging methods.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 38 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2025.

Builds on

38 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference Feedback13 Jun
  2. 2024CodeUltraFeedback: An LLM-as-a-Judge Dataset for Aligning Large Language Models to Coding Preferences14 Mar
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 35

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  7. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  8. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  9. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  10. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  11. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  12. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
23 more
  1. 2021GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 890
  2. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  3. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  4. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 816
  5. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 809
  6. 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
  7. 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
  8. 2023Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruningcited by 408
  9. 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 385
  10. 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 384
  11. 2024Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunitiescited by 247
  12. 2022Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Gamecited by 209
  13. 2020Just Pick a Sign: Optimizing Deep Multitask Models with Gradient Sign Dropoutcited by 199
  14. 2024RegMix: Data Mixture as Regression for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 172
  15. 2019Distributionally Robust Language Modelingcited by 142
  16. 2023Efficient Online Data Mixing For Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 77
  17. 2024Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMscited by 48
  18. 2024ScaleBiO: Scalable Bilevel Optimization for LLM Data Reweightingcited by 35
  19. 2016Minimizing the Maximal Loss: How and Why?cited by 30
  20. 2024Robust Multi-Task Learning with Excess Riskscited by 23
  21. 2022Mitigating Gradient Bias in Multi-objective Learning: A Provably Convergent Stochastic Approachcited by 14
  22. 2024Dynamic Multi-Reward Weighting for Multi-Style Controllable Generationcited by 13
  23. 2021Balancing Average and Worst-case Accuracy in Multitask Learningcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
  2. 2025Adaptive Batch-Wise Sample Scheduling for Direct Preference Optimization
  3. 2024Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective
  4. 2025Alignment through Meta-Weighted Online Sampling: Bridging the Gap between Data Generation and Preference Optimization
  5. 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
  6. 2024Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Prompts
  7. 2025DiffPO: Diffusion-styled Preference Optimization for Efficient Inference-Time Alignment of Large Language Models
  8. 2024Insights into Alignment: Evaluating DPO and its Variants Across Multiple Tasks