mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Multi-dimensional Evaluation of LLM Summarization across Domains and Languages

arXiv 2506.00549 ↗First posted 31 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluation frameworks for text summarization have evolved in terms of both domain coverage and metrics. However, existing benchmarks still lack domain-specific assessment criteria, remain predominantly English-centric, and face challenges with human annotation due to the complexity of reasoning. To address these, we introduce MSumBench, which provides a multi-dimensional, multi-domain evaluation of summarization in English and Chinese. It also incorporates specialized assessment criteria for each domain and leverages a multi-agent debate system to enhance annotation quality. By evaluating eight modern summarization models, we discover distinct performance patterns across domains and languages. We further examine large language models as summary evaluators, analyzing the correlation between their evaluation and summarization capabilities, and uncovering systematic bias in their assessment of self-generated summaries. Our benchmark dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/DISL-Lab/MSumBench.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2025.

Builds on

32 of 47 references.

References · 32

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  5. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
  6. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
  7. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  8. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
  9. 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
  10. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  11. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
  12. 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 477
20 more
  1. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 402
  2. 2021Efficient Attentions for Long Document Summarizationcited by 342
  3. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 285
  4. 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 284
  5. 2024Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answerscited by 255
  6. 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 251
  7. 2024Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 248
  8. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 233
  9. 2020MultiWOZ 2.2 : A Dialogue Dataset with Additional Annotation Corrections and State Tracking Baselinescited by 201
  10. 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 144
  11. 2021MediaSum: A Large-scale Media Interview Dataset for Dialogue Summarizationcited by 104
  12. 2022Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectorscited by 103
  13. 2023LongEval: Guidelines for Human Evaluation of Faithfulness in Long-form Summarizationcited by 96
  14. 2023MeetingBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Meeting Summarizationcited by 81
  15. 2024TofuEval: Evaluating Hallucinations of LLMs on Topic-Focused Dialogue Summarizationcited by 66
  16. 2022mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluationcited by 42
  17. 2024UniSumEval: Towards Unified, Fine-Grained, Multi-Dimensional Summarization Evaluation for LLMscited by 21
  18. 2022Measuring Annotator Agreement Generally across Complex Structured, Multi-object, and Free-text Annotation Taskscited by 16
  19. 2025Faithful, Unfaithful or Ambiguous? Multi-Agent Debate with Initial Stance for Summary Evaluationcited by 10
  20. 2023Enhancing Abstractiveness of Summarization Models through Calibrated Distillationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 8.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Large Language Models are Not Yet Human-Level Evaluators for Abstractive Summarization
  2. 2024Rethinking Scientific Summarization Evaluation: Grounding Explainable Metrics on Facet-aware Benchmark
  3. 2025Multi2: Multi-Agent Test-Time Scalable Framework for Multi-Document Processing
  4. 2024Learning to Summarize from LLM-generated Feedback
  5. 2023Evaluating Factual Consistency of Summaries with Large Language Models
  6. 2024Think Carefully and Check Again! Meta-Generation Unlocking LLMs for Low-Resource Cross-Lingual Summarization
  7. 2026Measuring What Matters Beyond Text: Evaluating Multimodal Summaries by Quality, Alignment, and Diversity
  8. 2025Learning to Summarize by Learning to Quiz: Adversarial Agentic Collaboration for Long Document Summarization