From Macro to Micro: Probing Dataset Diversity in Language Model Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dataset diversity plays a pivotal role for the successful training of many machine learning models, particularly in the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage of large language model (LLM) development. Despite increasing recognition of its importance, systematic analyses of dataset diversity still remain underexplored. To address this gap, this work presents a systematic taxonomy of existing diversity-control strategies, which primarily focus on the instruction component, operating at either macroscopic (entire instruction semantics) or mesoscopic levels (instruction units), and furthermore introduces a novel analysis of microscopic diversity within the response component, specifically analyzing the statistical distribution of tokens in SFT training samples. In the experimental evaluation, we construct fixed-size datasets (e.g., 10,000 samples each) from a corpus of 117,000 open-source SFT samples, incorporating six distinct diversity-control strategies spanning macro-, meso-, and microscopic levels applied to both instructions and responses. We then fine-tune LLMs on these datasets to assess the six diversity-control strategies. Results reveal that while macroscopic and mesoscopic strategies lead to higher performance with increasing diversity, the microscopic strategy in responses exhibits both a stronger correlation between model performance and the degree of diversity and superior performance with maximum diversity across all strategies. These findings offer actionable insights for constructing high-performance SFT datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.
Builds on
40 of 54 references.
References · 40
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
28 more
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
- 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
- 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 417
- 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
- 2023Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?cited by 192
- 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferencescited by 130
- 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 109
- 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
- 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
- 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
- 2024On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Modelscited by 59
- 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
- 2024Standardizing the Measurement of Text Diversity: A Tool and a Comparative Analysis of Scorescited by 50
- 2024Fishing for Magikarp: Automatically Detecting Under-trained Tokens in Large Language Modelscited by 46
- 2021Evaluating the Faithfulness of Importance Measures in NLP by Recursively Masking Allegedly Important Tokens and Retrainingcited by 31
- 2024Diversity Measurement and Subset Selection for Instruction Tuning Datasetscited by 29
- 2024TSDS: Data Selection for Task-Specific Model Finetuningcited by 28
- 2024Scaling Data Diversity for Fine-Tuning Language Models in Human Alignmentcited by 26
- 2024Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim Itcited by 26
- 2023Revisiting Token Dropping Strategy in Efficient BERT Pretrainingcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Multi-Agent Framework for Threat Mitigation and Resilience in AI-Based Systemscited by 2
- 2026EDCO: Dynamic Curriculum Orchestration for Domain-specific Large Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 2
- 2026Exploring the Limits of Pruning: Task-Specific Neurons, Model Collapse, and Recovery in Task-Specific Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Exploring the Limits of Pruning: Task-Specific Neurons, Model Collapse, and Recovery in Task-Specific Large Language Models29 Apr 2026
- 2026EDCO: Dynamic Curriculum Orchestration for Domain-specific Large Language Model Fine-tuning7 Jan 2026
- 2025Multi-Agent Framework for Threat Mitigation and Resilience in AI-Based Systems29 Dec 2025