mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond the Black Box: Interpretability of LLMs in Finance

arXiv 2505.24650 ↗First posted 14 May 2025cs.CE cs.LG q-fin.STcited by 11

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Knowledge and representations inside LLMs

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities across a spectrum of tasks in financial services, including report generation, chatbots, sentiment analysis, regulatory compliance, investment advisory, financial knowledge retrieval, and summarization. However, their intrinsic complexity and lack of transparency pose significant challenges, especially in the highly regulated financial sector, where interpretability, fairness, and accountability are critical. As far as we are aware, this paper presents the first application in the finance domain of understanding and utilizing the inner workings of LLMs through mechanistic interpretability, addressing the pressing need for transparency and control in AI systems. Mechanistic interpretability is the most intuitive and transparent way to understand LLM behavior by reverse-engineering their internal workings. By dissecting the activations and circuits within these models, it provides insights into how specific features or components influence predictions - making it possible not only to observe but also to modify model behavior. In this paper, we explore the theoretical aspects of mechanistic interpretability and demonstrate its practical relevance through a range of financial use cases and experiments, including applications in trading strategies, sentiment analysis, bias, and hallucination detection. While not yet widely adopted, mechanistic interpretability is expected to become increasingly vital as adoption of LLMs increases. Advanced interpretability tools can ensure AI systems remain ethical, transparent, and aligned with evolving financial regulations. In this paper, we have put special emphasis on how these techniques can help unlock interpretability requirements for regulatory and compliance purposes - addressing both current needs and anticipating future expectations from financial regulators globally.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge and representations inside LLMs, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2025.

Builds on

18 of 37 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  6. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,603
  7. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  8. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  9. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  10. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  11. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  12. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
6 more
  1. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
  2. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
  3. 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 129
  4. 2024SelfIE: Self-Interpretation of Large Language Model Embeddingscited by 67
  5. 2018Visualizing the Feature Importance for Black Box Modelscited by 55
  6. 2024Neural Causal Abstractionscited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Mechanistic interpretability of large language models with applications to the financial services industry
  2. 2025Measuring What LLMs Think They Do: SHAP Faithfulness and Deployability on Financial Tabular Classification
  3. 2025QuantMCP: Grounding Large Language Models in Verifiable Financial Reality
  4. 2025Interpreting LLMs as Credit Risk Classifiers: Do Their Feature Explanations Align with Classical ML?
  5. 2024Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey
  6. 2026Agentic Trading: When LLM Agents Meet Financial Markets
  7. 2024Designing Heterogeneous LLM Agents for Financial Sentiment Analysis
  8. 2023Deficiency of Large Language Models in Finance: An Empirical Examination of Hallucination