The Strong, Weak and Benign Goodhart's law. An independence-free and paradigm-agnostic formalisation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Goodhart's law is a famous adage in policy-making that states that ``When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure''. As machine learning models and the optimisation capacity to train them grow, growing empirical evidence reinforced the belief in the validity of this law without however being formalised. Recently, a few attempts were made to formalise Goodhart's law, either by categorising variants of it, or by looking at how optimising a proxy metric affects the optimisation of an intended goal. In this work, we alleviate the simplifying independence assumption, made in previous works, and the assumption on the learning paradigm made in most of them, to study the effect of the coupling between the proxy metric and the intended goal on Goodhart's law. Our results show that in the case of light tailed goal and light tailed discrepancy, dependence does not change the nature of Goodhart's effect. However, in the light tailed goal and heavy tailed discrepancy case, we exhibit an example where over-optimisation occurs at a rate inversely proportional to the heavy tailedness of the discrepancy between the goal and the metric. %
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.
Builds on
16 of 30 references.
References · 16
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 203
- 2018Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Lawcited by 149
- 2021Consequences of Misaligned AIcited by 80
- 2022Data Feedback Loops: Model-driven Amplification of Dataset Biasescited by 60
- 2020The Problem with Metrics is a Fundamental Problem for AIcited by 37
- 2021Using Adversarial Attacks to Reveal the Statistical Bias in Machine Reading Comprehension Modelscited by 29
- 2024Catastrophic Goodhart: regularizing RLHF with KL divergence does not mitigate heavy-tailed reward misspecificationcited by 23
- 2022Machine Learning Security in Industry: A Quantitative Surveycited by 21
- 2024Can a Bayesian Oracle Prevent Harm from an Agent?cited by 13
- 2023Goodhart's Law Applies to NLP's Explanation Benchmarkscited by 10
4 more
- 2024On Goodhart's law, with an application to value alignmentcited by 9
- 2022Are There Exceptions to Goodhart's Law? On the Moral Justification of Fairness-Aware Machine Learningcited by 6
- 2024Under manipulations, are some AI models harder to audit?cited by 5
- 2024Evolving AI Risk Management: A Maturity Model based on the NIST AI Risk Management Frameworkcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.