A Mathematical Framework for AI-Human Integration in Work
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid rise of Generative AI (GenAI) tools has sparked debate over their role in complementing or replacing human workers across job contexts. We present a mathematical framework that models jobs, workers, and worker-job fit, introducing a novel decomposition of skills into decision-level and action-level subskills to reflect the complementary strengths of humans and GenAI. We analyze how changes in subskill abilities affect job success, identifying conditions for sharp transitions in success probability. We also establish sufficient conditions under which combining workers with complementary subskills significantly outperforms relying on a single worker. This explains phenomena such as productivity compression, where GenAI assistance yields larger gains for lower-skilled workers. We demonstrate the framework' s practicality using data from O*NET and Big-Bench Lite, aligning real-world data with our model via subskill-division methods. Our results highlight when and how GenAI complements human skills, rather than replacing them.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.
Builds on
19 of 61 references.
References · 19
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
- 2023GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Modelscited by 176
- 2024Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluationscited by 148
- 2023A Theory for Emergence of Complex Skills in Language Modelscited by 113
- 2024When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysiscited by 106
- 2023Compositional Abilities Emerge Multiplicatively: Exploring Diffusion Models on a Synthetic Taskcited by 93
7 more
- 2023Skill-Mix: a Flexible and Expandable Family of Evaluations for AI modelscited by 64
- 2023Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behaviorcited by 36
- 2018Selection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Biascited by 29
- 2020Interventions for Ranking in the Presence of Implicit Biascited by 27
- 2013Concentration in unbounded metric spaces and algorithmic stabilitycited by 22
- 2021Human-machine Symbiosis: A Multivariate Perspective for Physically Coupled Human-machine Systemscited by 4
- 2024Does GPT Really Get It? A Hierarchical Scale to Quantify Human vs AI's Understanding of Algorithmscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.