Automated Modeling Method for Pathloss Model Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modeling propagation is the cornerstone for designing and optimizing next-generation wireless systems, with a particular emphasis on 5G and beyond era. Traditional modeling methods have long relied on statistic-based techniques to characterize propagation behavior across different environments. With the expansion of wireless communication systems, there is a growing demand for methods that guarantee the accuracy and interpretability of modeling. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques, in particular, are increasingly being adopted to overcome this challenge, although the interpretability is not assured with most of these methods. Inspired by recent advancements in AI, this paper proposes a novel approach that accelerates the discovery of path loss models while maintaining interpretability. The proposed method automates the formulation, evaluation, and refinement of the model, facilitating the discovery of the model. We examine two techniques: one based on Deep Symbolic Regression, offering full interpretability, and the second based on Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks, providing two levels of interpretability. Both approaches are evaluated on two synthetic and two real-world datasets. Our results show that Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks achieve the coefficient of determination value R^2 close to 1 with minimal prediction error, while Deep Symbolic Regression generates compact models with moderate accuracy. Moreover, on the selected examples, we demonstrate that automated methods outperform traditional methods, achieving up to 75% reduction in prediction errors, offering accurate and explainable solutions with potential to increase the efficiency of discovering next-generation path loss models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.
Builds on
24 of 57 references.
References · 24
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
- 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 649
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
- 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
- 2017Grammar Variational Autoencodercited by 285
- 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 156
- 2024Wav-KAN: Wavelet Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 122
- 2024KAN 2.0: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks Meet Sciencecited by 118
- 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
- 2021Symbolic Regression via Neural-Guided Genetic Programming Population Seedingcited by 101
12 more
- 2018Evolution-Guided Policy Gradient in Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2024Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Time Series: Bridging Predictive Power and Interpretabilitycited by 70
- 2018CEM-RL: Combining evolutionary and gradient-based methods for policy searchcited by 58
- 2020Guiding Deep Molecular Optimization with Genetic Explorationcited by 51
- 2024Kolmogorov-Arnold Graph Neural Networkscited by 32
- 2018Neural Program Synthesis with Priority Queue Trainingcited by 24
- 2023Evolving Scientific Discovery by Unifying Data and Background Knowledge with AI Hilbertcited by 18
- 2023Explainable AI in 6G O-RAN: A Tutorial and Survey on Architecture, Use Cases, Challenges, and Future Researchcited by 12
- 2024Machine Learning-Based Path Loss Modeling with Simplified Featurescited by 9
- 2024The Inefficiency of Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regressioncited by 8
- 2024The Energy Cost of Artificial Intelligence Lifecycle in Communication Networkscited by 4
- 2022Molecular Absorption Effect: A Double-edged Sword of Terahertz Communicationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.