mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Flexible Tool Selection through Low-dimensional Attribute Alignment of Vision and Language

arXiv 2505.22146 ↗First posted 28 May 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Flexible tool selection reflects a complex cognitive ability that distinguishes humans from other species, yet computational models that capture this ability remain underdeveloped. We developed a framework using low-dimensional attribute representations to bridge visual tool perception and linguistic task understanding. We constructed a comprehensive dataset (ToolNet) containing 115 common tools labeled with 13 carefully designed attributes spanning physical, functional, and psychological properties, paired with natural language scenarios describing tool usage. Visual encoders (ResNet or ViT) extract attributes from tool images while fine-tuned language models (GPT-2, LLaMA, DeepSeek) derive required attributes from task descriptions. Our approach achieves 74% accuracy in tool selection tasks-significantly outperforming direct tool matching (20%) and smaller multimodal models (21%-58%), while approaching performance of much larger models like GPT-4o (73%) with substantially fewer parameters. Human evaluation studies validate our framework's alignment with human decision-making patterns, and generalization experiments demonstrate effective performance on novel tool categories. Ablation studies revealed that manipulation-related attributes (graspability, elongation, hand-relatedness) consistently prove most critical across modalities. This work provides a parameter-efficient, interpretable solution that mimics human-like tool cognition, advancing both cognitive science understanding and practical applications in tool selection tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

Builds on

29 of 76 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  6. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  7. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  8. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  9. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  10. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  11. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  12. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
17 more
  1. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
  2. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  3. 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
  4. 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
  5. 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
  6. 2021Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistentcited by 259
  7. 2023LVLM-eHub: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 217
  8. 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Usecited by 217
  9. 2024When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning Methodcited by 204
  10. 2018Continual Learning of Context-dependent Processing in Neural Networkscited by 179
  11. 2019Evaluating Commonsense in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 95
  12. 2019Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoningcited by 61
  13. 2025LLMs for Explainable AI: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 45
  14. 2019Improvisation through Physical Understanding: Using Novel Objects as Tools with Visual Foresightcited by 34
  15. 2021How to select and use tools? : Active Perception of Target Objects Using Multimodal Deep Learningcited by 15
  16. 2024Comparison of fine-tuning strategies for transfer learning in medical image classificationcited by 14
  17. 2024From Linguistic Giants to Sensory Maestros: A Survey on Cross-Modal Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PhysToolBench: Benchmarking Physical Tool Understanding for MLLMs
  2. 2024UniAff: A Unified Representation of Affordances for Tool Usage and Articulation with Vision-Language Models
  3. 2024Task Success Prediction for Open-Vocabulary Manipulation Based on Multi-Level Aligned Representations
  4. 2026Don't Show Pixels, Show Cues: Unlocking Visual Tool Reasoning in Language Models via Perception Programs
  5. 2022Leveraging Language for Accelerated Learning of Tool Manipulation
  6. 2026Controlling Tool Use with Heading-Specific Activation Steering
  7. 2026AdaReasoner: Dynamic Tool Orchestration for Iterative Visual Reasoning
  8. 2026VC-Tooler: Learning Compositional and Adaptive Visual Tool Use