mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Visual Large Language Models Exhibit Human-Level Cognitive Flexibility in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

arXiv 2505.22112 ↗First posted 28 May 2025cs.AI q-bio.NCcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cognitive flexibility has been extensively studied in human cognition but remains relatively unexplored in the context of Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). This study assesses the cognitive flexibility of state-of-the-art VLLMs (GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5 Pro, and Claude-3.5 Sonnet) using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), a classic measure of set-shifting ability. Our results reveal that VLLMs achieve or surpass human-level set-shifting capabilities under chain-of-thought prompting with text-based inputs. However, their abilities are highly influenced by both input modality and prompting strategy. In addition, we find that through role-playing, VLLMs can simulate various functional deficits aligned with patients having impairments in cognitive flexibility, suggesting that VLLMs may possess a cognitive architecture, at least regarding the ability of set-shifting, similar to the brain. This study reveals the fact that VLLMs have already approached the human level on a key component underlying our higher cognition, and highlights the potential to use them to emulate complex brain processes.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

Builds on

16 of 51 references.

References · 16

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  4. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  5. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  6. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,407
  7. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
  8. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
  9. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
  10. 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 515
  11. 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into wordscited by 147
  12. 2024M3CoT: A Novel Benchmark for Multi-Domain Multi-step Multi-modal Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 121
4 more
  1. 2024Test of Time: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Temporal Reasoningcited by 88
  2. 2023Evaluating Cognitive Maps and Planning in Large Language Models with CogEvalcited by 77
  3. 2023Large Language Models are Visual Reasoning Coordinatorscited by 58
  4. 2024Integration of cognitive tasks into artificial general intelligence test for large modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Visual Language Models show widespread visual deficits on neuropsychological tests
  2. 2026Mind's Eye: A Benchmark of Visual Abstraction, Transformation and Composition for Multimodal LLMs
  3. 2025Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internally
  4. 2025Strong Memory, Weak Control: An Empirical Study of Executive Functioning in LLMs
  5. 2025Large Language Models Show Signs of Alignment with Human Neurocognition During Abstract Reasoning
  6. 2025Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs
  7. 2024Vision-Language Models Align with Human Neural Representations in Concept Processing
  8. 2025Visual serial processing deficits explain divergences in human and VLM reasoning